Traditional text-matching tools fail against contract cheating, AI-generated submissions, and sophisticated plagiarism. A defensible workflow automates deep stylistic analysis, cross-references citations against source databases, and detects prompt leakage or consistency anomalies. The operational upside is a 70-90% reduction in manual investigation time for faculty and administration, while creating auditable, case-level evidence that upholds institutional policy and withstands appeals. This moves integrity from a reactive, manual audit to a scalable, proactive control layer.




