Inferensys

Glossary

Soft Open Point (SOP)

A power electronic device, typically a back-to-back converter, that replaces a normally open tie switch to enable precise active and reactive power flow control between feeders.
Modern WeWork hardware lab area with product team collaborating around AI device prototypes, 3D printer in background, dramatic industrial lighting with product sketches on glass walls.
POWER ELECTRONICS

What is Soft Open Point (SOP)?

A Soft Open Point (SOP) is a power electronic device, typically a back-to-back voltage source converter, installed in place of a normally open tie switch to enable precise, dynamic control of active and reactive power flow between adjacent distribution feeders.

A Soft Open Point (SOP) replaces a conventional Normally Open Point (NOP) with a back-to-back converter to decouple feeder voltages while enabling bidirectional power transfer. Unlike a mechanical switch, an SOP provides continuous control over real and reactive power, allowing operators to balance loads, regulate voltage profiles, and integrate distributed energy resources without altering the grid's radial topology.

SOPs address the operational constraint of radiality by maintaining electrical separation between feeders while providing controllable power exchange. During faults, the device can instantaneously limit fault current contribution and support service restoration by transferring load to healthy feeders without the transient inrush associated with mechanical switching, thereby improving SAIDI metrics.

POWER ELECTRONICS

Core Capabilities of Soft Open Points

Soft Open Points replace traditional normally open tie switches with back-to-back converters, enabling precise, dynamic control of active and reactive power flow between distribution feeders.

01

Independent P-Q Control

Unlike mechanical switches that simply connect or isolate feeders, SOPs use back-to-back voltage source converters (VSCs) to decouple active and reactive power flows. Each converter independently regulates its output, enabling:

  • Active power transfer between feeders to balance loading
  • Reactive power injection or absorption at each terminal for voltage support
  • Four-quadrant operation without affecting the other feeder's power factor This decoupling is impossible with conventional tie switches and forms the foundation of SOP flexibility.
02

Real-Time Voltage Regulation

SOPs provide continuous, fast-acting voltage control at the feeder interconnection point. By injecting or absorbing reactive power independently on each side, the device can:

  • Mitigate voltage rise caused by high distributed generation penetration
  • Compensate for voltage drop during heavy loading conditions
  • Respond to fluctuations within milliseconds, far faster than mechanical tap changers This capability is critical for maintaining voltage within statutory limits on networks with high solar PV adoption.
03

Loss Minimization via Power Routing

By actively controlling the magnitude and direction of active power flow between feeders, SOPs enable dynamic loss reduction. The control system continuously solves an optimization problem to:

  • Shift power from lightly loaded feeders to heavily loaded ones
  • Reduce I²R losses in conductors by flattening the loading profile
  • Adapt to changing load and generation patterns throughout the day Studies on UK distribution networks have demonstrated loss reductions of 10-20% compared to fixed normally open point configurations.
04

Fault Isolation and Service Restoration

During fault conditions, SOPs enhance the self-healing capability of distribution networks. The power electronics can:

  • Instantly block fault current contribution to prevent propagation
  • Operate as a virtual circuit breaker by ceasing power transfer within microseconds
  • Enable seamless load transfer to healthy feeders without the momentary interruption associated with mechanical switching Post-fault, the SOP supports cold load pickup by ramping power gradually, avoiding the inrush currents that challenge conventional restoration schemes.
05

Distributed Generation Hosting Capacity

SOPs directly increase the amount of renewable generation a feeder can accommodate without reinforcement. By providing a controlled path for reverse power flows, the device:

  • Prevents thermal overload of the primary feeder by diverting excess generation to adjacent feeders
  • Mitigates voltage violations at the point of common coupling through dynamic reactive power absorption
  • Enables higher penetration of rooftop solar PV and small-scale wind without upgrading conductors or transformers This capability defers or eliminates costly network reinforcement projects.
06

Unbalanced Load Compensation

Distribution networks frequently experience phase imbalances due to uneven single-phase loading. SOPs with four-leg inverter topologies or three-phase converters can:

  • Transfer power selectively between phases to balance currents
  • Reduce neutral current and associated losses in the neutral conductor
  • Improve voltage symmetry at the feeder level This function extends transformer life by reducing thermal stress from negative-sequence currents and improves power quality for all connected customers.
TECHNICAL CLARIFICATIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Precise answers to common engineering questions about the topology, control, and operational integration of Soft Open Points in modern distribution networks.

A Soft Open Point (SOP) is a power electronic device, typically a back-to-back voltage source converter, that replaces a mechanical Normally Open Point (NOP) tie switch. While an NOP is a binary device—either open (no power flow) or closed (uncontrolled power flow)—an SOP enables continuous, bidirectional, and independent control of both active and reactive power flow between adjacent distribution feeders. This decoupling allows for precise load balancing, voltage profile smoothing, and loss minimization without violating the radiality constraint of the network. The SOP maintains galvanic isolation and prevents fault propagation, acting as a firewall while simultaneously providing dynamic power transfer capability that a simple mechanical switch cannot achieve.

FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY MATRIX

SOP vs. Normally Open Point (NOP) Comparison

A direct comparison of the operational characteristics and control capabilities between a traditional mechanical Normally Open Point and a power electronic Soft Open Point.

FeatureNormally Open Point (NOP)Soft Open Point (SOP)

Fundamental Technology

Mechanical switch (circuit breaker, recloser, or disconnect)

Power electronic back-to-back voltage source converter (VSC)

Normal Operating State

Open (zero current flow)

Closed (continuous power flow control)

Active Power Flow Control

Reactive Power Compensation

Voltage Regulation Capability

Response Time to Control Command

Seconds to minutes (mechanical actuation)

< 10 milliseconds (electronic switching)

Fault Current Contribution

Passes through fault current when closed

Limits fault current via converter current control

Service Restoration Speed

Manual or SCADA-driven switching (minutes)

Autonomous and instantaneous load transfer

GRID MODERNIZATION

Practical Applications of Soft Open Points

Soft Open Points (SOPs) replace traditional normally open tie switches with power electronic converters, enabling dynamic power flow control between adjacent distribution feeders. This unlocks capabilities impossible with mechanical switches, including reactive power compensation, loss minimization, and fast service restoration.

01

Active Power Transfer Between Feeders

Unlike a mechanical Normally Open Point (NOP) that is either fully open or fully closed, an SOP uses a back-to-back voltage source converter (VSC) topology to enable continuously variable active power transfer. This allows a lightly loaded feeder to share capacity with an overloaded neighbor without violating the radiality constraint—the converters decouple the feeders electrically while coupling them magnetically through the DC link. The control system can inject or absorb real power (P) independently on each AC terminal, effectively creating a controllable energy bridge that balances feeder loading in real time without reconfiguring the entire network topology.

0–100%
Power Transfer Range
< 20 ms
Response Time
02

Reactive Power Compensation at Both Terminals

Each VSC in an SOP can independently generate or absorb reactive power (Q) at its point of common coupling, functioning as a distributed STATCOM on each feeder. This four-quadrant operation provides dynamic voltage support without the need for discrete capacitor bank switching. Key benefits include:

  • Voltage profile flattening along both connected feeders
  • Mitigation of voltage rise caused by high distributed PV penetration
  • Reduction of reactive power flows through upstream transformers, decreasing I²R losses
  • Elimination of the hunting and transient inrush issues associated with mechanical switched capacitors
±100%
Reactive Power Range
4-Quadrant
Operational Mode
03

Loss Minimization via Optimal Power Flow

SOPs serve as actuators within a Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework that solves a mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problem to minimize total feeder losses. The objective function targets reduction of I²R losses across all line segments by continuously adjusting the SOP's P and Q setpoints. Unlike traditional Distribution Feeder Reconfiguration (DFR) which requires discrete switching events, SOP-based loss minimization is continuous and bumpless, avoiding the transient disturbances and equipment wear associated with mechanical switching. The optimization respects constraints including voltage limits, line thermal ratings, and the DC link power balance between the two VSCs.

5–15%
Loss Reduction Potential
04

Fast Service Restoration After Faults

During a Service Restoration (SR) event, an SOP provides capabilities far beyond a mechanical tie switch. When a fault occurs on one feeder, the SOP can:

  • Instantly transfer load from the faulted feeder to the healthy adjacent feeder through the DC link
  • Provide black-start capability to the isolated section by establishing voltage and frequency reference
  • Maintain fault current limiting through the converters' current control loops, preventing fault propagation to the healthy feeder
  • Enable seamless resynchronization when the fault is cleared, avoiding the phase-angle matching required for mechanical reclosing This reduces SAIDI by eliminating the minutes-long switching delays inherent in traditional restoration schemes.
< 1 cycle
Restoration Speed
05

Congestion Management Under High DER Penetration

High concentrations of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs)—particularly rooftop solar—create bidirectional power flows that can cause feeder congestion and voltage violations not anticipated in legacy radial designs. An SOP acts as a power flow valve, redirecting excess generation from a saturated feeder to a neighboring feeder with available hosting capacity. This defers or eliminates the need for traditional conductor upgrades and transformer replacements. The SOP's power electronics also provide harmonic filtering and negative sequence compensation, improving power quality at the interconnection point.

2–3x
DER Hosting Capacity Increase
06

Soft Meshing for Reliability Without Protection Complexity

Traditional meshed distribution operation is avoided because it requires directional overcurrent protection and complex distance relaying coordination. An SOP achieves the reliability benefits of meshing—multiple supply paths—while maintaining radial protection simplicity. Because the converters' current control loops inherently limit fault current contribution to approximately 1.2–1.5 pu of rated current, the SOP does not appear as a significant fault current source. Protection engineers can retain existing overcurrent coordination settings on both feeders without recalculation, as the SOP's limited fault contribution does not alter fuse-saving or recloser sequences.

Prasad Kumkar

About the author

Prasad Kumkar

CEO & MD, Inference Systems

Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.

His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.