A protection coordination study is an engineering analysis that selects pickup currents, time multiplier settings, and time-current characteristic (TCC) curves for every protective device in a power system. The objective is to achieve selective coordination, where only the protective device immediately upstream of a fault operates, isolating the minimum possible section of the network. This is accomplished by plotting device operating curves on a log-log scale and ensuring adequate coordination time intervals (CTI) between upstream and downstream devices, typically 0.2 to 0.4 seconds, to account for breaker operating time and relay overshoot.
Glossary
Protection Coordination Study

What is a Protection Coordination Study?
A protection coordination study is the systematic engineering analysis that determines optimal settings for protective devices in a power system to ensure the device closest to a fault trips first, maintaining service continuity for the rest of the network.
The study requires modeling the full system, including available fault current at each bus, transformer inrush points, and motor starting characteristics. Engineers evaluate phase and ground overcurrent elements, ensuring that Inverse Definite Minimum Time (IDMT) curves—such as IEEE moderately inverse or IEC normal inverse—are stacked correctly. For modern digital relays, the study also configures multiple setting groups to maintain coordination under changing grid topologies, such as when distributed generation alters fault current contributions and directionality.
Core Components of a Coordination Study
A protection coordination study is a systematic engineering analysis that ensures the protective device closest to a fault trips first. The following components define the technical workflow and parameters required to achieve absolute selectivity.
Time-Current Characteristic Curves
The graphical foundation of coordination, plotting operating time against fault current magnitude on a log-log scale. Engineers overlay device curves to verify that downstream devices operate faster than upstream devices across the full fault current range.
- Inverse Definite Minimum Time (IDMT) curves follow IEC 60255 or IEEE C37.112 standards
- Standard shapes include Normal Inverse, Very Inverse, and Extremely Inverse
- Curve shifting is achieved by adjusting the Time Multiplier Setting (TMS) or Time Dial
- The coordination interval—typically 0.2 to 0.4 seconds—accounts for breaker operating time, relay overshoot, and safety margin
Device Pickup Current Settings
The minimum current threshold at which a protective device begins its timing sequence. Pickup settings must be set above normal load current but below the minimum available fault current to ensure both security and dependability.
- Phase overcurrent pickup is typically set at 125-150% of full load current to accommodate transformer inrush and motor starting
- Ground fault pickup can be set more sensitively, often 10-40% of phase pickup, because ground faults are frequently low-magnitude
- Cold load pickup after an extended outage can reach 2-3x normal load, requiring careful pickup margin analysis
Short-Circuit Current Analysis
The calculation of maximum and minimum fault currents at every bus in the system, providing the electrical boundaries within which coordination must be maintained. This study models the impedance of generators, transformers, cables, and utility sources.
- Three-phase bolted faults define the maximum current for instantaneous element settings
- Line-to-ground faults with fault resistance define the minimum current for verifying sensitivity
- Arc flash incident energy calculations depend directly on the fault current magnitude and clearing time derived from the coordination study
- Modern software uses IEC 60909 or ANSI/IEEE calculation methods
Selectivity and Grading Margins
The core objective: ensuring the device electrically closest to the fault clears it without causing upstream devices to trip. Selectivity is verified by checking that no overlapping curves exist within the coordination interval.
- Grading margin between series devices accounts for circuit breaker interrupting time, relay reset time, and CT error
- Discrimination by time uses progressively longer time delays at upstream devices
- Discrimination by current uses the natural impedance difference between locations
- Logic selectivity uses GOOSE messaging or hardwired blocking signals for absolute coordination in critical zones
Equipment Damage Curves
Protection must not only be selective but also prevent thermal and mechanical damage to assets. The coordination study overlays device curves against equipment withstand limits to verify protection adequacy.
- Transformer through-fault protection curves per IEEE C57.109 define the maximum time a transformer can sustain a fault without damage
- Cable damage curves plot the I²t thermal limit of conductors based on insulation type and cross-sectional area
- Motor thermal limit curves define the safe stall time before winding insulation degrades
- The protective device must clear the fault before the equipment damage curve is reached
Protection Settings Documentation
The final deliverable is a comprehensive settings report that translates the coordination analysis into programmable parameters for each Intelligent Electronic Device (IED) in the system.
- Settings files include pickup currents, curve types, time dials, and instantaneous elements
- TCC plots are exported as part of the permanent engineering record
- Settings are validated against IEC 61850 logical node configurations for digital substations
- Revision-controlled documentation supports future system modifications and relay replacement without repeating the full study
Frequently Asked Questions
Clear, technically precise answers to the most common questions engineers ask about protection coordination studies, selectivity, and time-current characteristic analysis.
A protection coordination study is a systematic engineering analysis that selects and configures protective device settings—including pickup currents, time multiplier settings (TMS), and time-current curve (TCC) shapes—to ensure the device electrically closest to a fault trips first, isolating the minimum possible portion of the power system. This analysis is critical because it maintains selectivity, preventing upstream breakers or relays from unnecessarily de-energizing large sections of healthy network during a downstream fault. Without proper coordination, a minor fault on a branch feeder could cascade into a substation bus outage, violating IEEE 242 (Buff Book) recommendations and causing significant customer interruption. The study typically involves modeling the entire protection chain in software like ETAP or SKM PowerTools, plotting Inverse Definite Minimum Time (IDMT) curves on log-log paper, and verifying adequate coordination time intervals (CTI)—typically 0.2 to 0.4 seconds—between series devices to account for breaker operating time, relay overshoot, and a safety margin.
Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy
Intelligent Analysis, Decision & Execution
We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.
Talk to Us
Search across company data
Give teams answers from docs, tickets, runbooks, and product data with sources and permissions.
Useful when people spend too long searching or get different answers from different systems.

Automate internal workflows
Use AI to route work, draft outputs, trigger actions, and keep approvals and logs in place.
Useful when repetitive work moves across multiple tools and teams.

Add AI to products and internal tools
Build assistants, guided actions, or decision support into the software your team or customers already use.
Useful when AI needs to be part of the product, not a separate tool.
Related Terms
A protection coordination study relies on a deep understanding of device characteristics, fault behavior, and system topology. The following concepts are fundamental to executing and validating a selective coordination scheme.
Inverse Definite Minimum Time (IDMT) Curve
The mathematical backbone of coordination. An IDMT curve defines the relationship where the relay operating time is inversely proportional to the fault current magnitude. Standard shapes include normal inverse, very inverse, and extremely inverse. The study engineer selects curve types and Time Multiplier Settings (TMS) to ensure the downstream device's curve is always to the left and below the upstream device's curve on a time-current characteristic plot.
- Normal Inverse: General purpose distribution protection
- Very Inverse: Coordinates with fuse saving schemes
- Extremely Inverse: Suited for transformer inrush and motor starting
Selectivity and Discrimination
The primary objective of the study. Selectivity ensures that only the protective device closest to the fault operates, minimizing the number of customers affected. Discrimination is achieved through time grading, current grading, or logic selectivity (using GOOSE messaging). A failure in coordination results in sympathetic tripping, where an upstream breaker opens unnecessarily, causing a wider blackout.
- Total Discrimination: Achieved for all fault levels up to the maximum prospective short-circuit current
- Partial Discrimination: Achieved only up to a specific current threshold
Time-Current Characteristic (TCC) Curve
The primary visual tool for the study. A TCC curve is a log-log plot overlaying the operating characteristics of fuses, reclosers, and relays against the damage curves of cables and transformers. The coordination engineer visually inspects the gap between curves to verify that no overlap occurs. Modern software like ETAP or SKM PowerTools automates this plotting, but manual verification of the coordination time interval (CTI)—typically 0.2 to 0.4 seconds—is critical to account for breaker operating time and relay error.
Distributed Generation Fault Current
A modern challenge for coordination. Inverter-Based Resources (IBRs) like solar and battery storage contribute limited fault current, typically 1.1 to 1.5 per unit of rated current. This low fault current may be insufficient to trigger conventional overcurrent protection, leading to protection blinding or delayed tripping. The study must model the grid in both grid-connected and islanded modes, as fault levels change dramatically when the stiff utility source is absent.
Adaptive Protection Scheme
The evolution beyond static coordination. An adaptive protection scheme dynamically adjusts relay settings based on real-time grid topology. When a feeder tie switch closes or a generator comes online, the system recalculates fault current paths and pushes new protection setting groups to relays via IEC 61850. This ensures coordination integrity is maintained without manual re-engineering, essential for the self-healing grid.
- Setting Group: A pre-calculated set of relay parameters activated by a binary input or communication command
- Topology Processor: Software that determines the live switching state of the network
CT Saturation and Transient Response
A physical limitation that undermines coordination. Current Transformer (CT) saturation occurs when the magnetic core cannot linearly reproduce the primary current, causing the secondary waveform to distort. A relay seeing a saturated waveform may under-measure the true fault magnitude, delaying or preventing a trip. The study must verify that CTs are adequately sized for the maximum symmetrical and asymmetrical fault currents, including the DC offset component.
- Knee Point Voltage: The point on the CT excitation curve where a 10% increase in voltage causes a 50% increase in exciting current
- Class X CT: A low-leakage reactance CT specified for differential protection to avoid saturation mismatch

About the author
Prasad Kumkar
CEO & MD, Inference Systems
Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.
His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.
Partnered with leading AI, data, and software stack.
How We Work
Custom AI workflows for your Business
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
01
Review the use case
We understand the task, the users, and where AI can actually help.
Read more02
Pick the right approach
We define what needs search, automation, or product integration.
Read more03
Build the first useful version
We implement the part that proves the value first.
Read more04
Improve from there
We add the checks and visibility needed to keep it useful.
Read moreThe first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
Talk to Us