Glossary

eBPF Security

The use of the extended Berkeley Packet Filter to run sandboxed programs in the Linux kernel without changing kernel source code, enabling deep network and runtime observability for threat detection.

Get in touch Learn more

Security analyst reviewing fraud detection AI on multiple screens, alert dashboards visible, dark mode monitoring setup.

KERNEL-LEVEL OBSERVABILITY

What is eBPF Security?

eBPF Security leverages the extended Berkeley Packet Filter to run sandboxed, verifiable programs directly in the Linux kernel, enabling deep, real-time observability and enforcement for network, runtime, and system call behavior without kernel modification.

eBPF Security is a defensive paradigm that uses the Linux kernel's extended Berkeley Packet Filter to execute custom, sandboxed programs triggered by system events. By attaching to hooks in the kernel's syscall interface, network stack, and function entry/exit points, it provides context-rich telemetry on process execution, file access, and network connections. This enables real-time threat detection and runtime enforcement with minimal performance overhead, operating at a privileged level that is invisible to user-space malware.

Unlike traditional kernel modules, eBPF programs are verified for safety by the kernel's in-built verifier before loading, preventing system crashes or infinite loops. This allows security tools to enforce zero-trust network policies, detect container escapes, and monitor cryptographic operations without altering application code. The technology underpins modern Cloud Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) by providing a unified, non-invasive sensor for deep behavioral analytics across the entire software stack.

KERNEL-LEVEL OBSERVABILITY

Key Characteristics of eBPF Security

eBPF provides a revolutionary sandbox for running custom programs directly in the Linux kernel, enabling deep packet inspection and runtime security without the instability of kernel modules.

Sandboxed Kernel Execution

Programs are strictly verified by the eBPF verifier before loading. The verifier checks for out-of-bounds memory access, infinite loops, and unreachable instructions. This ensures that an observability agent cannot crash the kernel or introduce a privilege escalation vulnerability, unlike traditional kernel modules.

Hook Points for Deep Visibility

eBPF programs attach to predefined hook points in the kernel:

XDP (eXpress Data Path): Intercepts packets before they reach the network stack.
Tracepoints: Static markers in kernel code.
kprobes/uprobes: Dynamic instrumentation of kernel and user-space functions.
LSM (Linux Security Module): Enforces mandatory access control policies.

High-Performance Data Structures

eBPF uses BPF maps to share data between kernel and user space. These are generic key-value stores with specific types:

Hash tables for connection tracking.
Ring buffers for lossless event streaming.
Per-CPU arrays for lockless, high-speed counters. This architecture allows filtering millions of packets per second without copying data to user space.

Runtime Threat Detection

Security tools like Falco and Cilium leverage eBPF to detect anomalous behavior:

Monitoring execve() calls to catch cryptominers.
Tracking tcp_connect() to identify reverse shells.
Auditing file access to /etc/shadow. Because the logic runs in the kernel, an attacker cannot disable the sensor without a kernel exploit.

CO-RE: Write Once, Run Everywhere

Compile Once - Run Everywhere (CO-RE) solves the kernel portability problem. Using BTF (BPF Type Format) metadata, a single eBPF bytecode image can adapt to different kernel versions and configurations. This eliminates the need to install kernel headers or compile modules on the target machine, making deployment in containerized environments trivial.

Network Encryption Transparency

eBPF can inspect traffic before encryption (TLS) and after decryption. By hooking into SSL_read/SSL_write functions, security tools can observe plaintext HTTP/2 headers without terminating the TLS connection. This is critical for zero-trust architectures that require service mesh observability without man-in-the-middle certificate injection.

Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy

Intelligent Analysis, Decision & Execution

We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.

Talk to Us

Search across company data

Give teams answers from docs, tickets, runbooks, and product data with sources and permissions.

Useful when people spend too long searching or get different answers from different systems.

Enterprise searchRAGPermissions

Automate internal workflows

Use AI to route work, draft outputs, trigger actions, and keep approvals and logs in place.

Useful when repetitive work moves across multiple tools and teams.

AI agentsWorkflow automationGovernance

Add AI to products and internal tools

Build assistants, guided actions, or decision support into the software your team or customers already use.

Useful when AI needs to be part of the product, not a separate tool.

AI integrationDecision supportModel routing

eBPF SECURITY

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore the core concepts of eBPF security, from its sandboxed execution model to its role in deep kernel observability and runtime threat detection.

eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) is a revolutionary technology that allows sandboxed programs to run directly in the Linux kernel without modifying kernel source code or loading kernel modules. For security, it works by attaching small, verified programs to kernel hooks—such as system calls, network events, and function entry/exit points. The eBPF verifier statically analyzes the bytecode before loading to guarantee safety: no infinite loops, no out-of-bounds memory access, and strict instruction limits. Once attached, these programs can observe, filter, and even block malicious activity at the kernel level with minimal overhead. This enables deep runtime observability for threat detection, network policy enforcement, and container security without the traditional risks of kernel instability.

ECOSYSTEM

Related Terms

Core technologies and frameworks that intersect with eBPF to build a comprehensive kernel-level security posture.

Seccomp Default Deny

A Linux kernel security profile that blocks all system calls by default for a containerized process, explicitly allowing only a minimal set required for the application to function. When combined with eBPF, seccomp profiles can be dynamically generated based on real-time behavioral analysis rather than static manifests. eBPF programs observe the actual syscall patterns of a running workload and automatically construct a restrictive profile, reducing the kernel attack surface to the absolute minimum. This pairing eliminates the guesswork in traditional seccomp profile authoring.

Container Breakout Prevention

A set of defensive configurations—including user namespace remapping, capability dropping, and seccomp profiles—designed to prevent a process from escaping the container isolation boundary to the host. eBPF enhances breakout prevention by providing deep visibility into syscall invocations that indicate escape attempts, such as mount, unshare, or capset. Security tools like Falco use eBPF probes to detect anomalous privilege escalation patterns in real time, enabling immediate termination of compromised containers before they achieve host access.

Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)

A secure, isolated area within a main processor that guarantees the confidentiality and integrity of code and data loaded inside it. While TEEs protect computation at the hardware level, eBPF secures the observability and networking layer of the same workloads. The two technologies are complementary: TEEs shield sensitive models from host OS inspection, while eBPF programs monitor the TEE's external interactions—network flows, file descriptors, and syscalls—for signs of side-channel attacks or unauthorized data exfiltration attempts.

Open Policy Agent (OPA)

A general-purpose policy engine that decouples policy decision-making from application logic using the Rego language. eBPF and OPA intersect at the enforcement point: eBPF provides the kernel-level telemetry that feeds OPA's decision-making, while OPA defines the logical rules for what constitutes a violation. For example, an eBPF program detects a process opening an unexpected network socket, sends the event to OPA, and OPA evaluates it against organizational policy to determine if the action should be allowed, logged, or blocked.

Admission Controller

A Kubernetes-native plug-in that intercepts authenticated API requests to the cluster, enforcing custom security policies before objects are persisted. eBPF-based admission controllers extend this capability by validating runtime behavior against declared intent. A pod may pass static admission checks but exhibit anomalous behavior post-deployment. eBPF programs running on each node can feed runtime signals back to the admission control loop, enabling dynamic policy adjustments—such as cordoning a node or revoking a pod's network egress—based on observed kernel-level events.

Workload Identity Federation

A mechanism that allows a software workload to securely impersonate a service account using an external identity token, eliminating long-lived credentials. eBPF strengthens identity federation by providing cryptographically verifiable attestations of a workload's runtime behavior. An eBPF program can hash the set of executed syscalls, open files, and network connections, producing an integrity claim that the identity provider can validate before issuing a short-lived token. This ensures that only workloads exhibiting expected runtime profiles receive credentials.

About the author

Prasad Kumkar

CEO & MD, Inference Systems

Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.

His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.

Limited slotsGet a Free AI Consultation

How We Work

Custom AI workflows for your Business

One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.