Inferensys

Glossary

Memory Access Pattern

A memory access pattern describes the sequence and stride with which a program reads from or writes to memory locations, heavily influencing performance due to its impact on cache utilization and prefetching effectiveness.
Stylish WeWork-like workspace with hot desks and document wall, professional searching through enterprise knowledge base on a mounted ultrawide display, warm industrial pendants overhead.
COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE

What is a Memory Access Pattern?

A memory access pattern describes the sequence and stride with which a program reads from or writes to memory locations, which heavily influences performance due to its impact on cache utilization and prefetching effectiveness.

A memory access pattern is the predictable sequence in which a processor or accelerator reads and writes data. It is defined by the stride (distance between accessed elements) and locality (temporal or spatial reuse). Patterns like sequential, strided, or random access directly determine cache hit rates, bandwidth utilization, and the effectiveness of hardware prefetching. Optimizing these patterns is fundamental for performance on modern NPUs and GPUs, where memory latency often bottlenecks computation.

In neural network execution, patterns are dictated by data layouts (e.g., NCHW vs. NHWC) and kernel operations. A coalesced access pattern, where threads in a warp access contiguous memory, maximizes bandwidth on parallel hardware. Conversely, bank conflicts in shared memory or poor cache line utilization from non-sequential strides degrade performance. Compiler techniques for loop tiling and data layout transformation aim to reshape inherent access patterns to better match the underlying memory hierarchy.

NPU PERFORMANCE FUNDAMENTALS

Key Characteristics of Memory Access Patterns

Memory access patterns define the sequence and stride of data reads/writes, directly determining cache efficiency, bandwidth utilization, and overall NPU performance. Optimizing these patterns is critical for overcoming the memory wall in AI accelerators.

01

Spatial Locality

Spatial locality is the principle that if a particular memory location is accessed, nearby memory locations are also likely to be accessed in the near future. This is fundamental to cache line design and prefetching effectiveness.

  • Cache Line Utilization: Efficient patterns access all data within a fetched cache line before it is evicted.
  • Strided Access: A common pattern where data is accessed at fixed intervals (stride). A stride of 1 exhibits perfect spatial locality, while large, non-unit strides waste bandwidth.
  • Example: Processing a multi-dimensional tensor in row-major order versus column-major order results in vastly different spatial locality and performance on NPUs.
02

Temporal Locality

Temporal locality is the principle that if a memory location is accessed, it is likely to be accessed again soon. This drives the effectiveness of caching hierarchies by keeping frequently used data in fast, on-chip memory.

  • Reuse Distance: The number of distinct data elements accessed between consecutive uses of the same element. Short reuse distances enable high cache hit rates.
  • Working Set: The set of data actively used within a time window must fit within the available cache capacity to avoid thrashing.
  • NPU Impact: Kernel fusion and tiling are compiler optimizations explicitly designed to increase temporal locality for intermediate tensors in neural networks.
03

Access Granularity & Alignment

Access granularity refers to the size of each memory transaction, while alignment requires data addresses to be multiples of this granularity for optimal performance.

  • Coalesced Access: On NPUs and GPUs, concurrent threads should access contiguous, aligned memory blocks to merge requests into a single, wide transaction. Uncoalesced access serializes transactions, crippling bandwidth.
  • Hardware Mandate: Most high-bandwidth memory (HBM) interfaces and on-chip interconnects require naturally aligned accesses (e.g., 32-byte, 128-byte) for peak throughput.
  • Performance Penalty: Misaligned or sub-granular accesses trigger read-modify-write cycles or partial transactions, significantly increasing effective latency.
04

Access Streams & Bank Conflicts

Modern memory systems are interleaved across multiple physical banks to increase aggregate bandwidth. Access patterns must be structured to avoid conflicts.

  • Bank Conflict: Occurs when multiple concurrent requests target the same memory bank, causing serialization. Requests to different banks can proceed in parallel.
  • Address Mapping: The mapping of linear addresses to banks and rows is hardware-defined. Patterns with a stride equal to a power-of-two often cause severe bank conflicts.
  • NPU/GPU Focus: Achieving high occupancy requires scheduling thousands of threads whose collective access pattern avoids bank conflicts in shared memory or scratchpad SRAM.
05

Predictability for Prefetching

Prefetching relies on predictable access patterns to hide memory latency by moving data into cache before it is demanded. Unpredictable patterns defeat prefetchers.

  • Regular Strides: Simple linear or constant-stride patterns are easily predicted by hardware stream prefetchers.
  • Indirect Accesses: Patterns involving pointer chasing (e.g., graph traversals, sparse matrices) are inherently unpredictable, often requiring software-managed prefetch hints or different algorithms.
  • Compiler Role: Advanced NPU compilers analyze loop nests to insert software prefetch instructions for complex but analyzable patterns.
06

Read/Write Ratio & Coherency

The balance between read and write operations, and the need for coherence, defines the required memory subsystem capabilities and protocol overhead.

  • Read-Dominant: Most ML inference workloads are heavily read-dominant (weights, activations), optimizing for high read bandwidth.
  • Write-Back vs. Write-Through: Write-back policies (deferring writes) benefit write-heavy operations but add coherence complexity. NPU scratchpads often use explicit software management to avoid hardware coherence overhead.
  • Non-Temporal Writes: For data written once and not re-read soon (e.g., final output), streaming or non-temporal store instructions bypass caches to prevent pollution and save bandwidth.
MEMORY HIERARCHY MANAGEMENT

How Memory Access Patterns Impact Performance

A memory access pattern describes the sequence and stride with which a program reads from or writes to memory locations, which heavily influences performance due to its impact on cache utilization and prefetching effectiveness.

A memory access pattern defines the order and distance (stride) between memory addresses a program accesses. Performance is dominated by how well this pattern aligns with the hardware's memory hierarchy. Efficient patterns exhibit strong spatial and temporal locality, maximizing cache hits and enabling effective hardware prefetching. Inefficient patterns, like large, non-unit strides, cause frequent cache misses and poor bandwidth utilization, creating a memory wall where processors stall waiting for data.

For NPU acceleration, optimizing access patterns is critical. Compilers use techniques like loop tiling and data layout transformations to convert computations into hardware-friendly patterns. This ensures data movement aligns with the accelerator's scratchpad memory and high bandwidth memory (HBM) capabilities. The goal is to minimize latency and maximize throughput by ensuring the memory subsystem, not the compute cores, becomes the performance bottleneck.

PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS

Common Memory Access Patterns in AI/ML

A comparison of fundamental memory access patterns, their impact on cache utilization and bandwidth, and their prevalence in AI/ML workloads.

Pattern / CharacteristicSequential AccessStrided AccessGather/ScatterRandom Access

Definition

Accessing consecutive memory addresses in order.

Accessing memory addresses with a fixed, regular offset (stride).

Reading from or writing to a list of non-contiguous addresses (indirect addressing).

Accessing memory addresses with no predictable order.

Cache Utilization

Moderate (depends on stride)

Prefetching Effectiveness

Moderate (predictable stride)

Bandwidth Efficiency

High (if stride aligned)

Low (irregular)

Very Low

Typical AI/ML Use Case

Processing dense tensors, batch normalization.

Convolution operations, accessing filter weights.

Sparse matrix operations, embedding table lookups.

Hash table lookups, certain graph algorithms.

Coalescing Potential (for SIMD/SIMT)

High (if aligned)

Performance on NPU/GPU

High

Low (hardware-dependent)

Primary Bottleneck

Bandwidth (saturates bus)

Bandwidth / Cache Capacity

Memory Latency

Memory Latency & TLB Misses

NPU ACCELERATION

Optimization Techniques for Memory Access

Memory access patterns dictate the sequence and stride of data reads/writes, directly impacting cache hit rates, prefetching efficiency, and overall NPU throughput. Optimizing these patterns is fundamental to overcoming the memory wall.

01

Coalesced Memory Access

Coalesced access is a fundamental optimization where consecutive threads in a warp or wavefront access consecutive memory locations. This allows the memory controller to combine multiple requests into a single, wider transaction.

  • Mechanism: On an NPU, a 128-byte cache line request can satisfy 32 threads each reading a 4-byte float, if their accesses are contiguous.
  • Impact: Dramatically reduces the number of memory transactions, maximizing effective bandwidth.
  • Anti-Pattern: Strided or random access prevents coalescing, serializing requests and crippling throughput.
02

Tiling (Blocking)

Tiling (or blocking) is a data layout transformation that decomposes a large dataset into smaller sub-blocks (tiles) that fit entirely within a fast, on-chip memory like an NPU's scratchpad memory or L1 cache.

  • Process: A computation on a large matrix is broken into operations on smaller sub-matrices. Each tile is loaded once, used for multiple computations, and then written back.
  • Benefit: Exploits temporal locality by reusing data within the tile, and spatial locality via contiguous access within the block.
  • Use Case: Essential for optimizing Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and General Matrix Multiply (GEMM) kernels on NPUs.
03

Software Prefetching

Software prefetching involves explicitly inserting instructions to move data from slower memory (e.g., DRAM) into a faster cache level before it is needed by the compute units, thereby hiding memory latency.

  • Control: Unlike hardware prefetching, which reacts to patterns, software prefetch gives the programmer direct control over data movement timing.
  • NPU Application: Used in NPU kernels to pipeline computation and data transfer. While one tile is being processed, the next tile is prefetched into the scratchpad.
  • Challenge: Requires accurate prediction of future accesses and careful scheduling to avoid polluting the cache with unused data.
04

Memory Layout Transformation

This technique involves restructuring how data is arranged in memory to match the NPU's optimal access pattern, often converting Array-of-Structures (AoS) to Structure-of-Arrays (SoA).

  • AoS Problem: struct {float x, y, z;} points[N]; If a kernel only needs the x field, accesses are strided by 12 bytes, preventing coalescing.
  • SoA Solution: struct {float x[N], y[N], z[N];} All x values are contiguous, enabling perfectly coalesced reads.
  • NPU Consideration: NPU compilers often perform these transformations automatically, but manual control can be critical for irregular data structures or custom operations.
05

Bank Conflict Avoidance

Shared memory or scratchpad memory on NPUs is typically partitioned into independent banks that can be accessed simultaneously. A bank conflict occurs when two or more threads in the same instruction issue attempt to access different addresses within the same memory bank, forcing serialized access.

  • Cause: If shared memory has 32 banks (address interleaved), threads with a stride that is a multiple of 32 will collide.
  • Optimization: Pad array dimensions or carefully choose access strides to ensure threads map to unique banks.
  • Performance Impact: Severe bank conflicts can reduce shared memory bandwidth to a single access per cycle, nullifying its performance benefit.
06

Vectorized Load/Store

Vectorized memory operations use wide Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) or vector instructions to load or store multiple data elements with a single instruction. This increases instruction-level parallelism and reduces instruction fetch overhead.

  • Hardware Support: Modern NPUs have wide vector units (e.g., 128-bit, 256-bit) supporting load/store instructions for multiple contiguous elements.
  • Compiler Role: The compiler attempts to auto-vectorize loops, but programmers can use intrinsics (e.g., vld4q_f32 for ARM NEON) for explicit control.
  • Prerequisite: Requires memory alignment to the vector width (e.g., 16-byte alignment for 128-bit loads) for maximum performance and correctness on many architectures.
MEMORY HIERARCHY MANAGEMENT

Frequently Asked Questions

Memory access patterns are fundamental to achieving peak performance on Neural Processing Units (NPUs) and other accelerators. These questions address how data traversal strategies impact cache efficiency, bandwidth utilization, and overall system throughput.

A memory access pattern describes the sequence and stride with which a program reads from or writes to memory locations, which heavily influences performance due to its impact on cache utilization and prefetching effectiveness.

In NPU programming, the pattern dictates how data flows from high-latency global memory (like HBM) into fast, on-chip scratchpad memory or caches. Key characteristics include:

  • Spatial Locality: Accessing contiguous memory addresses (e.g., a dense array).
  • Temporal Locality: Reusing the same data multiple times in a short period.
  • Stride: The distance between consecutively accessed elements.

A coalesced access pattern, where threads in a warp or wavefront access contiguous, aligned blocks of memory, is optimal as it enables efficient use of the memory bus. Conversely, a random or strided pattern can lead to poor cache line utilization and frequent cache misses, creating a performance bottleneck known as the memory wall.

Prasad Kumkar

About the author

Prasad Kumkar

CEO & MD, Inference Systems

Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.

His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.