Homomorphic encryption is a cryptographic primitive that enables computation on ciphertexts, producing an encrypted result which, when decrypted, matches the output of a function applied to the original plaintext. Unlike traditional encryption that requires decryption before processing, this scheme allows a third party to perform arbitrary calculations on data without ever accessing the sensitive raw information, preserving confidentiality throughout the entire data lifecycle.
Glossary
Homomorphic Encryption

What is Homomorphic Encryption?
A cryptographic method that allows computations to be performed directly on encrypted data, generating an encrypted result that, when decrypted, matches the result of operations performed on the plaintext.
The three primary classifications are Partially Homomorphic Encryption (PHE), supporting only addition or multiplication; Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption (SHE), allowing a limited number of both operations; and Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), which supports arbitrary computation on ciphertexts. In financial fraud anomaly detection, FHE enables collaborative model inference where encrypted transaction data is scored against an encrypted model, returning an encrypted risk score without exposing the underlying transaction details to the model host.
Key Features of Homomorphic Encryption
Homomorphic encryption enables computation directly on ciphertexts, generating an encrypted result that decrypts to the correct plaintext output. This eliminates the need to decrypt sensitive data before processing, a critical capability for collaborative fraud analytics.
Partially Homomorphic Encryption (PHE)
Supports unlimited operations of a single type—either addition or multiplication, but not both. RSA encryption is additively homomorphic, while ElGamal is multiplicatively homomorphic. PHE schemes are computationally lightweight and practical for specific use cases like encrypted vote tallying or privacy-preserving aggregate statistics. In fraud detection, PHE can compute encrypted sums of transaction amounts across institutions without revealing individual values.
Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption (SHE)
Permits both addition and multiplication but only for circuits of limited depth. Each operation introduces noise that accumulates; once the noise exceeds a threshold, decryption fails. SHE schemes like BGV and BFV use modulus switching and noise management to extend computational depth. They are well-suited for evaluating low-degree polynomials, such as computing encrypted risk scores from transaction features without exposing raw data.
Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE)
Supports arbitrary computation on encrypted data with no theoretical limit on circuit depth. Gentry's 2009 breakthrough introduced bootstrapping—recursively refreshing ciphertext noise by homomorphically evaluating the decryption circuit itself. Modern FHE schemes (CKKS, TFHE) enable practical deep neural network inference on encrypted inputs. For fraud analytics, FHE allows a third party to run a proprietary ML model over encrypted transaction data and return an encrypted fraud score without ever seeing the plaintext.
Lattice-Based Security Foundation
All modern HE schemes derive security from hard problems on mathematical lattices, primarily the Ring Learning With Errors (RLWE) problem. RLWE is believed to be resistant to attacks by both classical and quantum computers, making HE post-quantum secure. The hardness assumption is that distinguishing noisy linear equations from random is computationally infeasible. This cryptographic foundation ensures that encrypted fraud data remains protected even against future quantum adversaries.
CKKS: Approximate Arithmetic Scheme
The Cheon-Kim-Kim-Song (CKKS) scheme operates on approximate real and complex numbers, making it the preferred choice for machine learning workloads. Unlike exact integer schemes, CKKS treats least significant bits as noise and performs fixed-point arithmetic natively. It supports efficient SIMD-style packing, encoding thousands of values into a single ciphertext. In fraud detection, CKKS enables encrypted logistic regression and neural network inference with minimal precision loss.
Threshold & Multi-Key FHE
Extends FHE to multi-party scenarios where data encrypted under different keys can be jointly computed upon. Threshold FHE requires a quorum of parties to collaboratively decrypt results, preventing any single entity from accessing plaintext. Multi-Key FHE allows computation across ciphertexts encrypted under distinct keys without prior coordination. This enables consortium-based fraud detection where multiple banks contribute encrypted data and jointly decrypt only aggregate anomaly scores.
Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy
Intelligent Analysis, Decision & Execution
We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.
Talk to Us
Search across company data
Give teams answers from docs, tickets, runbooks, and product data with sources and permissions.
Useful when people spend too long searching or get different answers from different systems.

Automate internal workflows
Use AI to route work, draft outputs, trigger actions, and keep approvals and logs in place.
Useful when repetitive work moves across multiple tools and teams.

Add AI to products and internal tools
Build assistants, guided actions, or decision support into the software your team or customers already use.
Useful when AI needs to be part of the product, not a separate tool.
Frequently Asked Questions
Clear, technically precise answers to the most common questions about performing computations on encrypted financial data without ever decrypting it.
Homomorphic encryption is a cryptographic method that allows computations to be performed directly on encrypted data, generating an encrypted result that, when decrypted, matches the result of operations performed on the plaintext. It works by constructing a mathematical mapping between operations in the plaintext space (like addition and multiplication) and corresponding operations in the ciphertext space. In a Partially Homomorphic Encryption (PHE) scheme, such as the Paillier cryptosystem, only one type of operation is supported—typically addition. Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) supports both addition and multiplication on ciphertexts, enabling arbitrary circuit evaluation. The underlying mechanism relies on introducing a controlled amount of noise into the ciphertext during encryption. Each homomorphic operation increases this noise. To prevent decryption failure, FHE schemes employ a costly procedure called bootstrapping, which homomorphically evaluates the decryption circuit itself to reset the noise level. This is the computational bottleneck that historically limited FHE's practicality, though recent advances in schemes like CKKS and TFHE have dramatically improved performance for real-world fraud detection workloads.
Related Terms
Explore the cryptographic primitives and protocols that enable collaborative fraud detection without exposing sensitive transaction data.
Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE)
The strongest form of homomorphic encryption, supporting arbitrary computations (unlimited additions and multiplications) on ciphertexts. FHE enables a third party to perform complex fraud scoring algorithms on encrypted transaction data without ever seeing the plaintext.
- Bootstrapping: A noise-reduction technique that enables unlimited depth circuits
- Lattice-based: Relies on the hardness of the Learning With Errors (LWE) problem
- Performance: Historically 1,000,000x slower than plaintext, but hardware acceleration is closing the gap
- Use case: A bank encrypts transaction logs and sends them to a cloud-based fraud model that returns encrypted risk scores without decrypting the data
Partially Homomorphic Encryption (PHE)
A restricted form of HE that supports only one operation type—either addition or multiplication, but not both. PHE is computationally lightweight and practical for specific fraud analytics tasks.
- Additive (Paillier): Enables encrypted sums for aggregating transaction values across institutions
- Multiplicative (RSA/ElGamal): Enables encrypted products for computing risk ratios
- Performance: Near-plaintext speed, making it viable for real-time fraud scoring pipelines
- Limitation: Cannot perform complex ML inference requiring both operations
Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption (SHE)
An intermediate scheme that supports a limited number of both additions and multiplications before noise overwhelms the ciphertext. SHE bridges the gap between PHE's efficiency and FHE's expressiveness.
- Bounded depth: Can evaluate shallow circuits like logistic regression or decision trees
- No bootstrapping: Avoids the heavy computational cost of FHE's noise management
- Ideal for: Running a pre-trained fraud classifier on encrypted data where the model architecture is known to fit within the circuit depth budget
- Trade-off: More expressive than PHE, faster than FHE, but requires careful circuit design
Homomorphic Encryption for Federated Learning
Combining HE with federated learning creates a double-blind privacy guarantee: the server aggregates encrypted model updates without seeing individual contributions, and clients never expose raw transaction data.
- Secure aggregation: Clients encrypt gradient updates with HE before sending to the central server
- Defense against gradient leakage: Prevents the server from reconstructing training samples from model updates
- Use case: A consortium of banks jointly trains a fraud detection model where each bank's transaction patterns remain cryptographically hidden from competitors
- Integration: Often paired with Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) for key management
Lattice-Based Cryptography
The mathematical foundation underlying most modern HE schemes. Lattice problems like Learning With Errors (LWE) and Ring-LWE provide security based on the hardness of finding short vectors in high-dimensional lattices.
- Post-quantum secure: Believed to resist attacks from both classical and quantum computers
- Worst-case to average-case reduction: Security proofs that are stronger than traditional factoring-based cryptography
- Noise growth: Each homomorphic operation adds noise to the ciphertext; managing this noise is the central engineering challenge
- Schemes: BGV, BFV, CKKS, and TFHE are all lattice-based HE constructions
CKKS Scheme for Approximate Arithmetic
A leveled homomorphic encryption scheme optimized for approximate fixed-point arithmetic on real numbers, making it the preferred choice for machine learning inference on encrypted data.
- Packed ciphertexts: Encodes multiple plaintext values into a single ciphertext using SIMD-style batching, enabling vectorized operations
- Rescaling: Manages noise by truncating least significant bits after multiplications, analogous to floating-point rounding
- Ideal for: Running neural network inference where exact precision is not required, such as fraud probability scoring
- Limitation: Not suitable for exact integer arithmetic required by financial accounting

About the author
Prasad Kumkar
CEO & MD, Inference Systems
Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.
His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.
Partnered with leading AI, data, and software stack.
How We Work
Custom AI workflows for your Business
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
01
Review the use case
We understand the task, the users, and where AI can actually help.
Read more02
Pick the right approach
We define what needs search, automation, or product integration.
Read more03
Build the first useful version
We implement the part that proves the value first.
Read more04
Improve from there
We add the checks and visibility needed to keep it useful.
Read moreThe first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
Talk to Us