Predicted Aligned Error (PAE) is a pairwise confidence metric that estimates the expected positional error (in Ångströms) between residue i and residue j when the predicted and true structures are aligned on residue i. It quantifies the model's uncertainty about the relative position and orientation of any two residues, independent of a global superposition.
Glossary
Predicted Aligned Error (PAE)

What is Predicted Aligned Error (PAE)?
A quantitative metric estimating the expected positional error between any two residues in a predicted protein structure, essential for assessing domain packing and global confidence.
A low PAE value between two residues indicates high confidence in their relative domain positioning, while high PAE suggests uncertainty. The PAE matrix is visualized as a heatmap, where blocks of low error along the diagonal correspond to well-predicted domains, and off-diagonal blocks reveal the confidence in inter-domain packing, making it a critical tool for evaluating global fold accuracy beyond per-residue metrics like pLDDT.
Key Characteristics of PAE
Predicted Aligned Error (PAE) is a critical confidence metric that estimates the expected positional error between every pair of residues in a predicted protein structure. It reveals the model's certainty about relative domain orientations and is essential for assessing global structural reliability.
Pairwise Error Estimation
PAE provides a residue-by-residue error matrix rather than a single global score. For a protein with N residues, the output is an N×N matrix where position (i, j) represents the predicted error in Angstroms for residue i if the predicted and true structures were aligned on residue j. This pairwise granularity allows researchers to identify locally confident regions even within globally uncertain structures.
Domain Orientation Confidence
PAE excels at revealing the model's certainty about relative domain positioning. When two folded domains are predicted with high confidence internally but show high PAE values between them, it indicates the model is uncertain about their relative orientation. This is critical for assessing quaternary structure predictions and understanding whether a predicted complex reflects a biologically meaningful assembly or an arbitrary docking arrangement.
Interpretation Thresholds
PAE values are measured in Angstroms (Å) and interpreted using established heuristics:
- < 5 Å: High confidence in relative position; domains are likely correctly packed
- 5-10 Å: Moderate confidence; general orientation may be correct but details are uncertain
- > 10 Å: Low confidence; relative positioning is unreliable
- > 15-20 Å: Essentially uninformative; the model cannot determine the spatial relationship
PAE vs. pLDDT
While pLDDT (predicted Local Distance Difference Test) measures per-residue local accuracy, PAE measures inter-residue spatial confidence. A structure can have high pLDDT scores—indicating well-predicted local geometry—yet exhibit high PAE values between domains, revealing that the model is uncertain about how those confidently folded domains are arranged relative to each other. These metrics are complementary and should be evaluated together.
Visualization in PAE Plots
PAE matrices are typically visualized as heatmaps where axes represent residue indices and color intensity indicates predicted error. Well-predicted domains appear as dark blocks along the diagonal, while inter-domain regions show lighter colors if uncertainty is high. Sharp boundaries between dark and light regions often correspond to domain boundaries or flexible linkers, making PAE plots powerful tools for domain parsing and assessing structural modularity.
Role in AlphaFold-Multimer
In AlphaFold-Multimer, PAE is the primary metric for evaluating predicted protein-protein interfaces. Low inter-chain PAE values indicate high-confidence binding interfaces, while uniformly high inter-chain PAE suggests the model does not predict a stable interaction. Researchers routinely filter predicted complexes by requiring inter-chain PAE below 10 Å to identify biologically relevant assemblies from spurious co-folding artifacts.
PAE vs. pLDDT: Complementary Confidence Metrics
How Predicted Aligned Error and predicted Local Distance Difference Test assess different aspects of structural confidence in AlphaFold predictions.
| Feature | PAE | pLDDT | Combined Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
What it measures | Expected positional error between residue pairs | Per-residue local accuracy confidence | Global and local reliability of the model |
Unit / Scale | Ångströms (Å), typically 0–30+ | 0–100 (unitless score) | Cross-referenced Å and score |
Primary use case | Assessing domain packing and relative domain orientation | Identifying well-folded core regions vs. disordered loops | Distinguishing high-confidence rigid bodies from flexible linkers |
Granularity | Pairwise (N×N matrix) | Per-residue (1D vector) | 2D matrix overlaid with 1D confidence |
Low value interpretation | Low Å = high confidence in relative position | Low score (<50) = likely disordered or unstructured | Low PAE + high pLDDT = rigid, well-packed domain |
High value interpretation | High Å = uncertain relative position between residues | High score (>90) = high local backbone accuracy | High PAE + high pLDDT = well-folded domains with uncertain relative orientation |
Output visualization | 2D heatmap with symmetric axes | Color-coded per-residue bar or ribbon on 3D structure | PAE plot with pLDDT-colored structure overlay |
Sensitivity to domain orientation | Directly captures inter-domain uncertainty | Insensitive to relative domain positioning | PAE reveals domain movement; pLDDT confirms domain integrity |
Frequently Asked Questions
Predicted Aligned Error (PAE) is a critical confidence metric for interpreting protein structure predictions. These answers address the most common questions computational biologists and drug discovery scientists have when evaluating domain packing and relative domain orientations.
Predicted Aligned Error (PAE) is a per-residue-pair confidence metric that estimates the expected positional error (in Ångströms) between residue i and residue j if the predicted and true structures were optimally aligned on residue i. It is output as a 2D heatmap where the value at position (i, j) answers the question: "If I align the structures on residue i, how far away will residue j be from its true position?" The metric is calculated directly by the Structure Module of AlphaFold2, which outputs a predicted distribution of pairwise distances and errors. A low PAE value (typically <5 Å) indicates high confidence in the relative position of the two residues, while high PAE values (>15 Å) suggest the relative orientation is uncertain. Unlike pLDDT, which assesses local per-residue accuracy, PAE is a pairwise metric that captures global domain-level confidence.
Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy
Intelligent Analysis, Decision & Execution
We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.
Talk to Us
Search across company data
Give teams answers from docs, tickets, runbooks, and product data with sources and permissions.
Useful when people spend too long searching or get different answers from different systems.

Automate internal workflows
Use AI to route work, draft outputs, trigger actions, and keep approvals and logs in place.
Useful when repetitive work moves across multiple tools and teams.

Add AI to products and internal tools
Build assistants, guided actions, or decision support into the software your team or customers already use.
Useful when AI needs to be part of the product, not a separate tool.
Related Terms
Understanding PAE requires familiarity with complementary structure prediction metrics and the architectural components that generate them.
Predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT)
A per-residue confidence metric output by AlphaFold2 that estimates the local accuracy of the predicted structure on a scale from 0 to 100.
- High pLDDT (>90): Indicates high confidence in the local backbone and side-chain conformation. These regions are typically suitable for detailed structural analysis.
- Low pLDDT (<50): Often corresponds to intrinsically disordered regions or flexible loops. These segments should be treated as unstructured and interpreted with extreme caution.
- Unlike PAE, which measures pairwise positional error, pLDDT is a self-assessment of local superposition quality, modeled on the lDDT-Cα metric used in CASP.
Global Distance Test (GDT_TS)
The primary scoring metric used in the CASP (Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) competition to evaluate the global topology of a predicted model against an experimental structure.
- Mechanism: It calculates the largest set of residues that can be superimposed under a series of distance cutoffs (1, 2, 4, and 8 Ångströms).
- Interpretation: A GDT_TS score of 100 represents a perfect prediction. Scores above 80 generally indicate a correctly predicted global fold.
- While PAE estimates error without a ground truth, GDT_TS is a post-hoc evaluation metric requiring an experimentally solved reference structure.
Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD)
A standard measure of the average distance between the atoms of superimposed protein structures, typically calculated over the Cα backbone atoms.
- Formula: RMSD quantifies the square root of the average squared distance between corresponding atoms after optimal rigid-body superposition.
- Limitations: RMSD is a global metric that can be disproportionately penalized by a single highly divergent loop, even if the core fold is correct. It does not provide the domain-pairing insight that PAE offers.
- Use PAE to assess relative domain orientation and RMSD to quantify overall backbone deviation when an experimental structure is available.
Invariant Point Attention (IPA)
A core architectural mechanism in the AlphaFold2 Structure Module that operates directly on 3D point clouds to iteratively refine the protein backbone geometry.
- SE(3) Equivariance: IPA updates residue representations in a way that is invariant to global rotation and translation. If you rotate the input, the predicted structure rotates identically.
- Relationship to PAE: The IPA module produces the final 3D coordinates, and the PAE matrix is derived from the model's internal assessment of the error in these pairwise distances. The PAE head is trained to predict the error of the IPA's output.
Evoformer
The core neural network block in AlphaFold2 that processes the Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) and pairwise representations, acting as the information exchange engine.
- Function: It uses axial attention to flow information between rows (sequences) and columns (residues) of the MSA, while simultaneously updating a pairwise residue matrix that encodes proximity relationships.
- PAE Origin: The pairwise representation output by the Evoformer is the direct input to the PAE prediction head. The quality of the MSA and the Evoformer's processing fundamentally determine the sharpness and accuracy of the PAE plot.
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs)
Proteins or protein regions that lack a stable 3D structure under physiological conditions, existing as a dynamic ensemble of conformations.
- PAE Signature: IDPs and flexible linkers exhibit a characteristic pattern in PAE plots: high predicted error (red) for inter-residue distances within the disordered region, but low error (blue) for residues within adjacent structured domains.
- Interpretation: A high-PAE region with a corresponding low pLDDT score is a strong indicator of disorder, not a failure of the prediction algorithm. This pattern is biologically meaningful and should not be misinterpreted as a low-quality prediction.

About the author
Prasad Kumkar
CEO & MD, Inference Systems
Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.
His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.
Partnered with leading AI, data, and software stack.
How We Work
Custom AI workflows for your Business
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
01
Review the use case
We understand the task, the users, and where AI can actually help.
Read more02
Pick the right approach
We define what needs search, automation, or product integration.
Read more03
Build the first useful version
We implement the part that proves the value first.
Read more04
Improve from there
We add the checks and visibility needed to keep it useful.
Read moreThe first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
Talk to Us