Inferensys

Glossary

Capable-to-Promise (CTP)

An extension of Available-to-Promise (ATP) that, in addition to on-hand inventory, evaluates production capacity and material availability to determine if a product can be manufactured and delivered by a requested date.
Wide-angle shot of a modern WeWork open floor plan with creative walls covered in AI system architecture diagrams, product team collaborating in standing desk area with industrial lighting.
ORDER PROMISING LOGIC

What is Capable-to-Promise (CTP)?

Capable-to-Promise (CTP) is an advanced order promising methodology that extends beyond current inventory levels to evaluate production capacity and material availability, determining if a product can be manufactured and delivered by a requested date.

Capable-to-Promise (CTP) is a real-time order promising logic that, unlike Available-to-Promise (ATP) which only checks on-hand and scheduled inventory, dynamically evaluates the feasibility of creating new supply. The system interrogates the Master Production Schedule (MPS), Bill of Materials (BOM), and finite capacity scheduling models to determine if unplanned production can be inserted to meet a specific customer request.

A CTP engine performs a multi-level check, verifying raw material availability, work center capacity, and tooling constraints before committing to a delivery date. This process often integrates with constraint-based solvers to generate a feasible production slot, ensuring that the promise is not just based on what exists, but on what can be realistically manufactured within the required lead time.

CAPABLE-TO-PROMISE

Core Characteristics of CTP

Capable-to-Promise (CTP) extends standard availability checks by evaluating production capacity and material availability alongside on-hand inventory. This ensures delivery commitments are feasible from a manufacturing perspective, not just a warehouse one.

01

Multi-Constraint Evaluation

Unlike ATP, which only checks static inventory, CTP simultaneously evaluates three critical constraints:

  • Material Availability: Confirms raw components and sub-assemblies are in stock or scheduled to arrive.
  • Production Capacity: Verifies that work centers, labor, and tooling have available time slots within the required window.
  • Lead Times: Factors in queue time, setup time, run time, and teardown for each routing operation. This prevents overpromising on orders that would require impossible production schedules.
02

Finite Capacity Scheduling Integration

CTP logic relies on a finite capacity scheduling model of the factory floor. Rather than assuming infinite capacity, it loads orders against a realistic model of resource constraints.

  • The engine searches for the earliest time slot where both materials and capacity align.
  • It accounts for existing work-in-progress (WIP) and already-promised orders.
  • The result is a feasible delivery date that reflects actual shop floor conditions, not theoretical throughput.
03

Bill of Materials Explosion

CTP performs a multi-level BOM explosion to determine true feasibility:

  • The system navigates from the finished good down through all sub-assemblies to raw materials.
  • For each component, it checks on-hand inventory, scheduled receipts, and lead times.
  • If a critical component is missing, the engine can identify the earliest replenishment date and calculate the cascading impact on final delivery. This provides a complete picture of supply chain readiness for a new order.
04

Alternative Resource Routing

Advanced CTP engines can evaluate alternative routings and substitute materials when the primary path is constrained:

  • If Work Center A is overloaded, the system checks if Work Center B can perform the same operation.
  • If a specific grade of material is unavailable, it checks approved substitutes defined in the supersession chain.
  • This dynamic re-routing maximizes throughput and increases the probability of meeting the customer's requested date without manual intervention.
05

What-If Simulation Capability

CTP provides a simulation mode that allows planners to test scenarios without committing real capacity:

  • Evaluate the impact of a large, unexpected order on the existing production schedule.
  • Model the effect of a machine breakdown or material delay on all open promises.
  • Compare delivery date outcomes across multiple plants to determine the optimal fulfillment location. This capability supports strategic decision-making before a promise is made to the customer.
06

Real-Time Promise Response

CTP is designed for synchronous, real-time order promising during customer inquiry:

  • The entire constraint evaluation, BOM explosion, and scheduling search must complete in sub-second response times.
  • This requires high-performance in-memory processing and optimized data models.
  • The output is an immediate, reliable delivery date that the organization can confidently commit to, improving customer experience and reducing manual order review.
ORDER PROMISING LOGIC COMPARISON

ATP vs. CTP: Key Differences

A technical comparison of Available-to-Promise and Capable-to-Promise methodologies for generating reliable delivery date commitments.

FeatureAvailable-to-Promise (ATP)Capable-to-Promise (CTP)

Primary Constraint Evaluated

On-hand and scheduled inventory

Inventory plus production capacity and material availability

Scope of Check

Warehouse and in-transit stock levels

Entire manufacturing and supply chain ecosystem

Bill of Materials (BOM) Consideration

Production Capacity Modeling

Supplier Lead Time Integration

Limited to scheduled receipts

Full multi-tier supplier network evaluation

Calculation Complexity

Low to moderate

High

Response Time

< 1 second

1-10 seconds

Ideal Use Case

Finished goods distribution

Make-to-order and configure-to-order manufacturing

CAPABLE-TO-PROMISE (CTP) EXPLAINED

Frequently Asked Questions

Clear, technically precise answers to the most common questions about Capable-to-Promise logic, its mechanics, and its role in modern order promising.

Capable-to-Promise (CTP) is an advanced order promising logic that determines if a product can be manufactured and delivered by a requested date by evaluating not only on-hand inventory but also production capacity and material availability. Unlike a basic Available-to-Promise (ATP) check, which only looks at existing stock and scheduled receipts, CTP dynamically creates a simulated production order. The CTP engine explodes the bill of materials (BOM) to verify that all required components are available or can be procured in time, checks the routing to confirm that work centers have sufficient capacity during the required time window, and then calculates a feasible completion date. This process involves backward scheduling from the requested delivery date to determine the latest possible production start date, ensuring the commitment is operationally realistic.

Prasad Kumkar

About the author

Prasad Kumkar

CEO & MD, Inference Systems

Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.

His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.