In-memory computing (IMC) eliminates the data movement bottleneck between processor and memory by executing multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations directly where data resides. Using memristor crossbar arrays, physical Ohm's and Kirchhoff's laws perform analog matrix-vector multiplication in a single step, drastically reducing energy consumption for deep learning inference workloads like modulation classification.
Glossary
In-Memory Computing

What is In-Memory Computing?
In-memory computing is an analog computing paradigm that performs matrix-vector multiplication directly within the memory array using memristor crossbars, bypassing the von Neumann bottleneck for ultra-efficient dot-product engines.
This approach leverages non-volatile resistive memory elements to store neural network weights as conductance values. When input voltages representing activations are applied to the crossbar rows, the resulting currents at the columns instantaneously compute the dot-product output. This inherent parallelism makes IMC a compelling candidate for accelerating quantized neural networks on resource-constrained edge devices.
Key Features of In-Memory Computing
In-memory computing (IMC) eliminates the von Neumann bottleneck by performing matrix-vector multiplication directly within the memory array using physical laws like Ohm's and Kirchhoff's. This paradigm leverages memristor crossbars to deliver ultra-efficient dot-product engines for AI inference.
Memristor Crossbar Architecture
A two-dimensional grid where memristors at each intersection store conductance values representing weight matrices. When input voltages are applied to rows, the resulting currents along columns physically compute the dot-product via Kirchhoff's current law.
- Analog MVM: Matrix-vector multiplication occurs in O(1) time complexity regardless of matrix dimensions
- Non-volatile storage: Weights persist without power, eliminating data movement between memory and compute units
- Sneak path mitigation: Requires selector devices or complementary resistive switches to prevent unintended current paths
Eliminating the von Neumann Bottleneck
Traditional architectures shuttle data between separate memory and processor units, incurring latency and energy penalties that dominate AI workloads. In-memory computing collapses this distinction.
- Compute where data resides: Arithmetic is performed directly on stored values using analog circuit physics
- Bandwidth wall bypass: Eliminates the memory bus as the primary throughput limiter for data-intensive operations
- Locality maximization: Weight stationary dataflow keeps model parameters fixed in place while activations flow through
Analog vs. Digital In-Memory Computing
Two distinct approaches exist for performing computation within memory arrays, each with different precision and reliability trade-offs for RF inference workloads.
- Analog IMC (AIMC): Uses continuous conductance states and physical laws; susceptible to noise, variability, and ADC/DAC overhead but offers extreme density
- Digital IMC (DIMC): Performs bit-wise logic within modified SRAM cells; deterministic and precise but lower density than analog approaches
- Hybrid approaches: Combine analog dot-product engines with digital accumulation and activation functions for balanced precision-efficiency
Non-Volatile Memory Technologies
The physical memory element determines the fidelity, endurance, and scalability of in-memory computing. Emerging resistive memories provide multi-level conductance states essential for weight encoding.
- RRAM (Resistive RAM): Metal-oxide stacks switch resistance via filament formation; high endurance and CMOS compatibility
- PCM (Phase-Change Memory): Chalcogenide glass transitions between amorphous and crystalline states; mature technology with good multi-level capability
- MRAM (Magnetic RAM): Spin-transfer torque switches magnetic tunnel junctions; infinite endurance but limited resistance ratio
- FeFET (Ferroelectric FET): Uses polarization states for non-volatile threshold voltage shifts; promising for high-density 3D integration
Peripheral Circuit Co-Design
The memory array alone cannot function as a compute engine. Peripheral circuits including DACs, ADCs, and transimpedance amplifiers critically determine overall system performance.
- DAC resolution: Input digital-to-analog converters set the precision of applied voltages; typically 1-4 bits for energy efficiency
- ADC bottleneck: Analog-to-digital conversion of column currents dominates latency and energy; flash ADCs and successive approximation offer different trade-offs
- Transimpedance amplifiers: Convert accumulated currents to voltages with gain; must handle wide dynamic range from large dot-product sums
- Shift-and-add logic: Handles multi-bit weight and activation decomposition for bit-serial computation schemes
Mapping Neural Network Layers to Crossbars
Deploying trained models onto in-memory computing hardware requires weight-to-conductance mapping and handling of negative values, large layers, and non-idealities.
- Differential pairs: Each weight is represented by the conductance difference between two memristors to encode both positive and negative values
- Layer tiling: Large weight matrices exceeding crossbar dimensions are partitioned across multiple physical arrays with partial sum accumulation
- Conductance programming: Iterative write-verify algorithms tune each memristor to its target conductance within acceptable error tolerance
- Batch normalization folding: BN parameters are mathematically absorbed into weights and biases before mapping to avoid runtime analog division
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore the fundamental concepts behind analog matrix computation and memristor-based architectures that eliminate the von Neumann bottleneck for ultra-efficient RF inference.
In-memory computing is an analog processing paradigm that performs matrix-vector multiplication (MVM) directly within the memory array itself, rather than shuttling data between separate memory and processor units. It works by leveraging the physical properties of memristor crossbars, where each memory cell stores a weight as conductance and applies Ohm's law for multiplication and Kirchhoff's current law for summation along bitlines. When input voltages representing a vector are applied to the rows, the resulting currents on the columns instantaneously represent the dot-product output. This physical computation bypasses the von Neumann bottleneck, achieving O(1) time complexity for MVM operations that dominate neural network inference, making it particularly valuable for real-time modulation classification on resource-constrained FPGA-coupled accelerators.
Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy
Intelligent Analysis, Decision & Execution
We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.
Talk to Us
Search across company data
Give teams answers from docs, tickets, runbooks, and product data with sources and permissions.
Useful when people spend too long searching or get different answers from different systems.

Automate internal workflows
Use AI to route work, draft outputs, trigger actions, and keep approvals and logs in place.
Useful when repetitive work moves across multiple tools and teams.

Add AI to products and internal tools
Build assistants, guided actions, or decision support into the software your team or customers already use.
Useful when AI needs to be part of the product, not a separate tool.
Related Terms
Explore the foundational techniques and hardware architectures that enable in-memory computing for ultra-efficient RF inference.
Memristor Crossbar Array
The physical substrate of in-memory computing, consisting of a grid of non-volatile resistive memory elements at each intersection. Ohm's law and Kirchhoff's current law naturally perform analog multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations in a single step.
- Stores synaptic weights as conductance values
- Performs vector-matrix multiplication in O(1) time complexity
- Suffers from non-idealities like IR drop and sneak path currents
Analog-to-Digital Conversion Bottleneck
The critical interface challenge where the analog result of an in-memory dot-product must be converted to the digital domain. High-precision ADCs often consume more energy and area than the crossbar itself.
- Dominates total system power budget (>60%)
- Drives research into bit-slicing and current-mode sensing
- Trade-off: ADC resolution vs. classification accuracy
von Neumann Bottleneck
The fundamental architectural limitation that in-memory computing overcomes. In traditional processors, data shuttles between separate memory and compute units, creating a memory wall that wastes energy and time.
- Eliminates weight fetches from DRAM
- Reduces energy per MAC to femtojoules
- Critical for battery-constrained edge devices
Conductance Mapping
The process of programming neural network weights onto memristor conductances. Since conductances are strictly positive, representing signed weights requires differential pairs.
- Differential pair: G = G⁺ - G⁻ using two devices
- Limited by finite conductance levels (typically 64-128 states)
- Write-verify algorithms ensure programming accuracy
Process-in-Memory (PIM)
A broader category that includes digital logic integrated within memory banks. Unlike pure analog crossbars, DRAM-based PIM uses digital MAC units near the bitlines, offering higher precision at the cost of lower density.
- Samsung's HBM-PIM integrates FP16 compute
- Compatible with standard CMOS fabrication
- No analog noise susceptibility
Non-Volatile Memory Devices
The enabling technology for in-memory computing, retaining weight data without power. Key device types include:
- RRAM: Resistive switching via oxygen vacancy filaments
- PCM: Phase-change between amorphous and crystalline states
- STT-MRAM: Magnetic tunnel junction switching
- FeFET: Ferroelectric field-effect transistor with multi-level states

About the author
Prasad Kumkar
CEO & MD, Inference Systems
Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.
His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.
Partnered with leading AI, data, and software stack.
How We Work
Custom AI workflows for your Business
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
01
Review the use case
We understand the task, the users, and where AI can actually help.
Read more02
Pick the right approach
We define what needs search, automation, or product integration.
Read more03
Build the first useful version
We implement the part that proves the value first.
Read more04
Improve from there
We add the checks and visibility needed to keep it useful.
Read moreThe first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
Talk to Us