Inferensys

Glossary

Traffic Steering Policy

A defined set of rules, often driven by an AI/ML inference engine, that dictates how user traffic is directed across different frequency layers, cells, or Radio Access Technologies (RATs) to optimize network performance.
Developer testing AI inference on mobile phone in hand, laptop with optimization code visible, casual tech review moment.
DEFINITION

What is Traffic Steering Policy?

A traffic steering policy is a defined set of rules, often driven by an AI/ML inference engine, that dictates how user traffic is directed across different frequency layers, cells, or Radio Access Technologies (RATs) to optimize network performance and resource utilization.

A Traffic Steering Policy is the logical rulebook that governs how a network distributes user data flows across its available radio resources. Unlike reactive load balancing, these policies are increasingly driven by predictive AI/ML inference engines that forecast congestion and proactively shift traffic to the optimal frequency layer, cell, or RAT before Quality of Service degrades.

These policies operate within the Near-RT RIC as xApps, consuming real-time E2 node telemetry to make decisions on a sub-second timescale. By defining conditions based on predicted PRB utilization, CQI, and QoS Class Identifiers, the policy engine orchestrates seamless inter-frequency and inter-RAT handovers to maintain user experience while maximizing spectral efficiency.

TRAFFIC STEERING POLICY

Key Characteristics of AI-Driven Policies

An AI-driven traffic steering policy is a dynamic rule set that uses real-time inference to direct user traffic across frequency layers, cells, and Radio Access Technologies (RATs). These policies replace static thresholds with predictive, intent-based logic.

01

Intent-Based Configuration

Policies are defined by high-level business objectives rather than low-level radio parameters. An operator specifies an intent such as 'maximize energy efficiency while maintaining a minimum user throughput of 10 Mbps,' and the AI inference engine translates this into dynamic handover thresholds, Cell Individual Offsets (CIO), and frequency priorities in real time. This abstraction eliminates manual per-cell tuning and ensures the network continuously adapts to meet the declared goal.

02

Multi-Objective Optimization

A single policy simultaneously balances competing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) using a weighted reward function. The engine evaluates trade-offs between:

  • Load balancing index: Equalizing PRB utilization across cells
  • Spectral efficiency: Maximizing bits per second per Hertz
  • Handover success rate: Minimizing radio link failures during transitions
  • Energy consumption: Reducing power amplifier output during low load The policy defines the Pareto-optimal frontier for these objectives, allowing the network to make context-aware sacrifices when necessary.
03

Context-Aware Steering Triggers

Unlike static RSSI-based handovers, AI-driven policies incorporate rich contextual features to decide when and where to steer traffic. The inference engine ingests:

  • Predicted cell load from time-series forecasting models
  • UE mobility state: stationary, pedestrian, or vehicular
  • QoS Class Identifier (QCI) of active bearers
  • Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) reports
  • Beam-level metrics in massive MIMO deployments This prevents unnecessary handovers for stationary users and prioritizes steering for high-mobility UEs approaching congested cells.
04

Closed-Loop Policy Execution

The policy executes as a continuous control loop within the Near-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller (Near-RT RIC). An xApp subscribes to E2 node KPIs on a 10ms to 1s interval, runs the inference model, and enforces steering decisions via the E2 interface. The loop includes:

  • Observation: Ingest real-time telemetry and UE measurements
  • Orientation: Compare current state against policy intent
  • Decision: Compute optimal traffic distribution
  • Action: Adjust CIO, reselection priorities, or trigger directed handovers
  • Evaluation: Monitor outcome and feed back into the model
05

RAT and Layer Steering Logic

Policies define hierarchical rules for inter-RAT and inter-frequency mobility. A typical policy stack includes:

  • Coverage layer: Anchor UEs on sub-1 GHz FDD for reliability
  • Capacity layer: Steer high-throughput UEs to mid-band TDD (n78/n79)
  • Offload triggers: Move UEs to unlicensed spectrum (NR-U) or Wi-Fi when QoS permits
  • Energy-saving state: Migrate all traffic away from a cell scheduled for deep sleep The AI engine respects service continuity constraints, ensuring voice calls on 5G remain on gNB until EPS fallback conditions are met.
06

Policy Conflict Resolution

When multiple policies overlap—for example, an energy-saving policy and a QoS-assurance policy—the system employs a priority-based arbitration mechanism. Each policy carries a precedence value and a scope definition (cell-level, slice-level, or UE-group-level). The Near-RT RIC resolves conflicts by:

  • Applying the highest-precedence policy for overlapping scopes
  • Merging non-conflicting steering actions where possible
  • Logging overridden actions for auditability This ensures deterministic behavior even when multiple xApps are operating concurrently on the same RIC platform.
TRAFFIC STEERING POLICY

Frequently Asked Questions

Clear, technically precise answers to the most common questions about AI-driven traffic steering policies in modern radio access networks.

A traffic steering policy is a defined set of rules, often driven by an AI/ML inference engine, that dictates how user traffic is directed across different frequency layers, cells, or Radio Access Technologies (RATs). Unlike static, threshold-based handover parameters, a modern traffic steering policy dynamically evaluates multiple inputs—such as predicted cell load, Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) reports, and Quality of Service (QoS) requirements—to make proactive routing decisions. The policy operates as a closed-loop control mechanism, ingesting real-time telemetry from the RAN, evaluating conditions against defined objectives, and executing steering actions via adjusted handover parameters or RAT reselection commands. This enables the network to balance load, maintain Service Level Agreements (SLAs), and optimize spectrum efficiency without manual intervention.

Prasad Kumkar

About the author

Prasad Kumkar

CEO & MD, Inference Systems

Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.

His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.