Craft.co excels at providing a broad, user-friendly view of a company's financial health and business relationships, making it a strong fit for procurement teams needing quick supplier qualification. Its strength lies in aggregating millions of data points into a '360-degree view' that includes news sentiment, spend analysis, and growth signals. For example, a procurement manager can rapidly assess a private supplier's revenue trajectory without needing deep investigative skills.
Difference
Craft.co vs Sayari: A Technical Comparison of Supplier Intelligence Platforms

Introduction
A data-driven comparison of Craft.co and Sayari for mapping corporate ownership and assessing supplier financial health.
Sayari takes a fundamentally different approach by specializing in deep, graph-based mapping of global corporate ownership structures, particularly for complex, cross-border entities. This results in a powerful tool for uncovering hidden beneficial owners and sanction evasion risks that surface-level checks miss. The trade-off is a steeper learning curve, as the platform is designed for investigators and compliance analysts who need to trace control through opaque offshore networks.
The key trade-off: If your priority is rapid, accessible supplier financial health checks integrated into a procurement workflow, choose Craft.co. If you prioritize deep-tier entity resolution and uncovering hidden corporate control for sanctions compliance, choose Sayari. Consider your team's primary use case: is it supplier onboarding speed or investigative depth for high-risk jurisdictions?
Feature Comparison Matrix
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for supplier intelligence platforms.
| Metric | Craft.co | Sayari |
|---|---|---|
Corporate Ownership Depth | Private & public company data; strong on financials | Graph-native; specializes in opaque global ownership structures |
Graph-Based Mapping | ||
Private Company Data Depth | Moderate; strong for Western markets | Deep; specializes in hard-to-access jurisdictions |
Integration with Procurement Systems | ||
Adverse Media Screening | ||
Sanctions & Watchlist Coverage | ||
Ultimate Beneficial Ownership (UBO) Resolution | Good for standard structures | Excellent for complex, multi-jurisdictional shells |
TL;DR Summary
A quick-look comparison of strengths and trade-offs for supplier intelligence platforms, focusing on financial health, corporate ownership, and procurement integration.
Craft.co: Financial Health & Private Company Depth
Superior financial data on private companies: Craft.co aggregates financial metrics, news, and firmographic data on millions of private and public entities. This matters for supplier financial risk assessments where traditional credit reports are unavailable.
- Strength: Granular revenue estimates, employee counts, and growth signals.
- Trade-off: Ownership mapping is less exhaustive than graph-native platforms, potentially missing opaque offshore structures.
Craft.co: Procurement Workflow Integration
Designed for sourcing workflows: Craft.co provides supplier discovery, RFI management, and performance scorecards natively. This matters for procurement teams needing a unified platform from sourcing to risk monitoring.
- Strength: Strong integrations with ERP and source-to-pay suites like Coupa and SAP Ariba.
- Trade-off: Disruption monitoring relies more on financial signals than real-time geopolitical event feeds.
Sayari: Graph-Based Corporate Ownership
Best-in-class entity resolution and ownership mapping: Sayari builds a global knowledge graph connecting corporate registries, sanctions lists, and trade data. This matters for uncovering hidden beneficial ownership and sanctions evasion risks.
- Strength: Traverses complex, multi-jurisdictional corporate structures to find ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs).
- Trade-off: Lighter on predictive financial health scoring compared to platforms aggregating P&L-style estimates.
Sayari: Trade Compliance & Supply Chain Mapping
Purpose-built for trade compliance and forced labor detection: Sayari's graph links shipment records, corporate registries, and risk lists. This matters for customs and compliance teams screening for UFLPA or sanctions exposure.
- Strength: Deep data on global trade flows and counterparty relationships, enabling multi-tier supply chain mapping.
- Trade-off: Less focus on procurement workflow automation; often requires integration with separate sourcing platforms for full RFx management.
When to Choose Craft.co vs Sayari
Craft.co for Supplier Risk
Strengths: Craft.co excels at providing a 360-degree view of supplier health by layering financial data, news sentiment, and corporate family trees onto a single supplier record. Its strength lies in financial health scoring and the ability to quickly assess private company stability through modeled credit data.
Verdict: Choose Craft.co if your primary concern is the financial viability of your direct suppliers and you need a platform that integrates easily with procurement workflows for ongoing monitoring.
Sayari for Supplier Risk
Strengths: Sayari is purpose-built for deep corporate ownership and network analysis. Its graph-native architecture allows you to instantly traverse complex, multi-tier ownership structures to uncover ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) and hidden control relationships, especially in high-risk jurisdictions.
Verdict: Choose Sayari if your focus is on Nth-tier mapping, sanctions evasion detection, and understanding the true control structure of opaque corporate entities.
Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy
Intelligent Analysis, Decision & Execution
We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.
Talk to Us
Search across company data
Give teams answers from docs, tickets, runbooks, and product data with sources and permissions.
Useful when people spend too long searching or get different answers from different systems.

Automate internal workflows
Use AI to route work, draft outputs, trigger actions, and keep approvals and logs in place.
Useful when repetitive work moves across multiple tools and teams.

Add AI to products and internal tools
Build assistants, guided actions, or decision support into the software your team or customers already use.
Useful when AI needs to be part of the product, not a separate tool.
Cost and Commercial Model Comparison
Direct comparison of pricing transparency, data depth, and total cost of ownership for supplier intelligence platforms.
| Metric | Craft.co | Sayari |
|---|---|---|
Pricing Transparency | Public tiers available | Custom enterprise quote |
Free Tier / Trial | ||
Core Data Model | Company profiles & news | Global corporate structures |
Private Company Data Depth | Moderate (US/EU focus) | Deep (Global focus) |
Primary User Persona | Sales & Procurement | Compliance & Risk |
Typical Annual Contract | $15k - $50k+ | $50k - $150k+ |
API Access Included | Higher tiers |
Verdict
A balanced, data-driven verdict to help CTOs and procurement leaders choose between Craft.co's financial health focus and Sayari's corporate ownership graph depth.
Craft.co excels at providing a comprehensive, quantified view of a supplier's financial health and operational performance. Its core strength lies in aggregating and scoring millions of private and public companies using a proprietary Craft Score, which synthesizes financial data, news sentiment, and operational signals. For example, a procurement team can instantly benchmark a critical Tier-2 supplier's financial stability against industry peers, enabling data-driven sourcing decisions without manual financial analysis.
Sayari takes a fundamentally different approach by focusing on graph-based corporate ownership and global trade data. Its platform maps complex, multi-jurisdictional corporate structures to uncover hidden beneficial ownership, sanctions evasion risks, and supply chain dependencies. This results in a powerful tool for deep-dive investigations, but it requires more analytical expertise to interpret the graph relationships compared to Craft.co's intuitive scoring system.
The key trade-off: If your priority is continuous, at-a-glance monitoring of supplier financial viability and operational risk for thousands of vendors, choose Craft.co. If your core need is to perform deep-due diligence on high-risk suppliers, map opaque corporate structures, and ensure compliance with sanctions and forced labor regulations, choose Sayari. For a mature risk program, the two platforms are often complementary, with Craft.co serving as the broad monitoring layer and Sayari as the precision investigative tool.

About the author
Prasad Kumkar
CEO & MD, Inference Systems
Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.
His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.
Partnered with leading AI, data, and software stack.
How We Work
Custom AI workflows for your Business
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
01
Review the use case
We understand the task, the users, and where AI can actually help.
Read more02
Pick the right approach
We define what needs search, automation, or product integration.
Read more03
Build the first useful version
We implement the part that proves the value first.
Read more04
Improve from there
We add the checks and visibility needed to keep it useful.
Read moreThe first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
Talk to Us