Differences
Private RAG Architectures
Private RAG Architectures
Comparisons related to retrieval-augmented generation systems where both the retriever and generator run within a private boundary. Target: Data Privacy Officers comparing LlamaIndex, Haystack, and custom RAG pipelines for sensitive document Q&A.
LlamaIndex vs Haystack for Private RAG
Comparing the two leading open-source frameworks for building retrieval-augmented generation pipelines that keep data within a private boundary. Focuses on ingestion flexibility, pipeline customization, and deployment complexity for sensitive document Q&A.
LlamaIndex vs LangChain for Private RAG
Evaluating the trade-offs between LlamaIndex's data-centric indexing and LangChain's general-purpose agent chaining for constructing private RAG systems. Key metrics include ease of local deployment, retrieval accuracy, and integration with on-prem LLMs.
Qdrant vs Weaviate for Private Vector Store
A direct comparison of two high-performance vector databases designed for air-gapped and on-premises deployments. Analysis covers filtering performance, quantization for memory efficiency, and resilience in disconnected environments.
pgvector vs Qdrant for Private RAG
Comparing the simplicity of a PostgreSQL extension against a purpose-built vector database for private retrieval. Focuses on operational overhead, query latency at scale, and the trade-off between transactional data and vector search performance.
FAISS vs ChromaDB for On-Prem RAG
Contrasting Meta's library-based approach to similarity search with ChromaDB's developer-friendly database for local retrieval. Key considerations include indexing speed, memory usage, and the developer experience for prototyping private RAG.
Ollama vs vLLM for Private LLM Serving
Comparing the ease-of-use of Ollama against the high-throughput, production-grade serving capabilities of vLLM for private LLM backends. Focuses on quantization support, GPU utilization, and latency under concurrent user loads.
Mistral 7B vs Llama 3 for Private RAG Generator
Benchmarking two leading open-weight models for the generation component of a private RAG system. Evaluates instruction-following accuracy, context utilization, and inference speed on consumer-grade hardware.
BGE vs E5 for Private Embedding Model
Comparing BAAI's BGE and Microsoft's E5 embedding models for retrieval accuracy in private, domain-specific document sets. Focuses on performance on the MTEB leaderboard and model size trade-offs for on-prem deployment.
Unstructured vs LlamaParse for Private Document Parsing
Evaluating general-purpose document preprocessing against a LlamaCloud-optimized parser for air-gapped RAG ingestion. Compares handling of complex PDF elements like tables and charts without sending data to external APIs.
Semantic Chunking vs Recursive Character Splitting for On-Prem Retrieval
Comparing context-aware chunking strategies against rule-based splitting for maintaining semantic coherence in private documents. Analysis focuses on retrieval precision and the impact on downstream LLM generation quality.
HNSW vs DiskANN for On-Prem Vector Search
Contrasting the in-memory graph-based HNSW algorithm with Microsoft's disk-optimized DiskANN for large-scale private vector indexes. Key metrics include recall, query speed, and the ability to handle billion-scale datasets on limited RAM.
BM25 vs Hybrid Search for On-Prem Document Q&A
Comparing traditional keyword-based retrieval against a combination of sparse and dense vectors for private RAG. Evaluates the performance uplift of hybrid search on out-of-domain queries and exact match scenarios.
Cross-Encoder Re-ranker vs LLM-based Re-ranker for On-Prem RAG
Evaluating the accuracy-latency trade-off between a lightweight cross-encoder model and a full LLM for re-ranking retrieved documents. Focuses on the cost and speed implications for a fully local RAG pipeline.
GraphRAG vs Vector RAG for Private Document Q&A
Comparing Microsoft's graph-based approach to retrieval against standard vector search for answering multi-hop questions over private datasets. Analysis covers entity extraction overhead, global query performance, and infrastructure complexity.
Local LLM vs Cloud API for Private RAG Generator
The fundamental architectural decision for private RAG: balancing the data privacy of a local model against the superior reasoning quality of a frontier cloud API. Compares total cost of ownership, latency, and regulatory compliance.
GPTCache vs Redis Semantic Cache for Private RAG
Comparing a dedicated LLM cache with a general-purpose data store for reducing inference costs and latency in private deployments. Focuses on cache hit accuracy, similarity matching algorithms, and operational simplicity.
Mem0 vs Letta for Private Agent Memory
Evaluating two specialized platforms for managing long-term agent state and memory without cloud dependency. Compares memory consolidation strategies, context retrieval mechanisms, and integration with local LLM stacks.
Agentic RAG vs Standard RAG for Private Document Q&A
Comparing a dynamic, multi-step agent-based retrieval approach against a static retrieve-then-read pipeline for complex private document analysis. Focuses on task completion rates, tool-use capabilities, and the increased latency and cost of agentic loops.
Partnered with leading AI, data, and software stack.
How We Work
Custom AI workflows for your Business
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
01
Review the use case
We understand the task, the users, and where AI can actually help.
Read more02
Pick the right approach
We define what needs search, automation, or product integration.
Read more03
Build the first useful version
We implement the part that proves the value first.
Read more04
Improve from there
We add the checks and visibility needed to keep it useful.
Read moreThe first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
Talk to Us