Automation
Architecture review before implementation
Implementation scope and rollout planning
Clear next-step recommendation
This blueprint details a custom workflow that replaces periodic audit cycles with continuous, AI-driven detection of SoD conflicts across ERP systems like SAP and Oracle, preventing fraud and operational errors.
Manual quarterly SoD audits are slow, costly, and leave dangerous gaps for fraud. A custom automation workflow continuously ingests user-role assignments from SAP S/4HANA or Oracle Fusion, applying graph analysis and rule-based agents to detect risky permission combinations—like a user who can both create a vendor and approve a payment—in real-time. This shifts compliance from a reactive audit to a proactive control, directly reducing financial risk and manual audit labor.
Implementation integrates with ServiceNow for ticketing and IGA platforms like SailPoint for remediation. The orchestration layer, built with LangGraph, manages state, handles exceptions, and ensures audit trails. Critical controls include human-in-the-loop approval gates for high-risk violations and a rollback capability for erroneous auto-remediation. This architecture delivers measurable ROI through reduced fraud exposure, lower audit preparation costs, and automated enforcement of SOX controls.
A custom workflow for real-time SoD monitoring transforms a reactive, audit-based compliance process into a proactive control layer that prevents fraud and operational errors before they occur.
By detecting risky permission combinations—like a user who can both create a vendor and approve payments—in real-time, this workflow prevents the execution of fraudulent transactions. It automates the blocking of conflicting transactions or the immediate revocation of one of the conflicting entitlements, directly protecting revenue and assets. This moves security from detective to preventive, shrinking the window for malicious activity from months (between audits) to minutes.
Periodic SoD reviews are labor-intensive, requiring analysts to manually extract user-role data from SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite, or custom ERPs and cross-reference them against conflict matrices. This workflow automates that entire process, running continuous graph analysis across the IGA or ERP system. It flags only true violations with contextual evidence, reducing thousands of manual review hours per audit cycle to a managed exception queue.
When a violation is detected, the workflow doesn't just create a ticket—it orchestrates a remediation path. Agents automatically route the finding to the user's manager or a compliance officer via ServiceNow or Jira, propose the safest entitlement to remove based on usage analytics, and, upon approval, execute the change via the IAM system's APIs. This closes the loop from detection to enforcement in hours, not weeks, continuously driving the organization toward a verified least-privilege state.
For SOX, GDPR, or other frameworks, demonstrating effective access controls is paramount. This workflow generates an immutable, timestamped audit trail for every detected violation, risk score, approval, and remediation action. Automated reporting agents can produce auditor-ready packages on demand, proving continuous monitoring and control effectiveness. This turns compliance from a costly, stressful annual event into a byproduct of daily operations.
Many SoD violations are not malicious but stem from provisioning errors during role changes or mergers. This workflow acts as a safety net, catching these misconfigurations as soon as they are made—often before the user even logs in. By preventing users from accidentally initiating invalid transactions, it avoids costly operational corrections, financial reconciliations, and potential regulatory fines associated with control failures.
Implementing this workflow builds the core orchestration layer—using tools like LangGraph for agent coordination—that ingests real-time entitlement feeds, applies rule-based and ML-based conflict detection, and integrates with ITSM and IAM APIs. This architecture becomes the foundation for extending proactive governance to other areas like access certification, role engineering, and sensitive data access, creating compounding efficiency and risk management gains.
This blueprint details a production-grade, multi-agent workflow that continuously monitors ERP entitlements to detect and remediate risky permission combinations in real-time, preventing fraud and ensuring SOX compliance.
This workflow automates the continuous detection of Segregation of Duties (SoD) conflicts across ERP systems like SAP S/4HANA and Oracle Fusion, moving beyond periodic manual audits. It identifies high-risk user-permission combinations—such as a single user able to both create a vendor and approve a payment—that could enable fraud or operational errors. The operational upside comes from preventing financial loss, reducing manual audit labor by over 70%, and providing continuous compliance evidence for regulators.
Implementation integrates directly with IAM platforms and ERP APIs via a LangGraph-based orchestrator, which manages the detection agents and remediation logic. Critical controls include configurable risk thresholds, mandatory human review for high-severity conflicts, and a full audit trail logged to a SIEM. Deployment requires phased rollout by business unit, with exception-handling logic for legacy role mappings and a dashboard for real-time observability into violation trends and remediation status.
A custom automation workflow that continuously monitors user entitlements across ERP systems to detect and remediate SoD conflicts in real-time, preventing fraud and simplifying SOX compliance.
An agent continuously ingests user-role assignments from source systems like SAP S/4HANA and Oracle E-Business Suite, constructing a live permission graph. Using graph algorithms, it identifies risky combinations (e.g., a user who can both create a vendor and approve a payment) that violate predefined SoD rules, flagging conflicts as they occur—not months later during an audit.
A rules-based agent evaluates each detected conflict against configurable business logic, scoring the risk based on user seniority, department, and historical behavior. High-risk violations are routed for immediate remediation, while low-risk findings can be logged for periodic review. This prioritization prevents alert fatigue and focuses effort where it matters.
Upon confirmation, the workflow orchestrates remediation by automatically creating tickets in ServiceNow or Jira, assigning them to the appropriate role owner or IT security. For pre-approved, low-risk scenarios, it can execute API calls to the IAM or ERP system to remove the conflicting entitlement, with all actions logged for a full audit trail.
The workflow is built as an orchestration layer (using frameworks like LangGraph) that connects via APIs to core systems: ERP (SAP, Oracle), Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) platforms (SailPoint, Saviynt), and ticketing systems. This decoupled design allows the business logic to remain consistent while adapting to each system's specific API schema and data model.
For high-impact changes or exceptions, the workflow integrates mandatory approval gates. Notifications are sent via Slack or Microsoft Teams to managers or compliance officers, who can review the context and approve/reject the remediation action directly within the communication flow, ensuring oversight without breaking operational speed.
All detections, risk scores, actions, and approvals are written to an immutable audit log. A real-time dashboard provides SOC 2 and SOX auditors with a single pane of glass for compliance reporting, demonstrating continuous control monitoring and drastically reducing the manual evidence-collection burden during audit seasons.
This blueprint details a phased, production-ready implementation for a custom AI workflow that continuously monitors ERP entitlements to detect and remediate Segregation of Duties (SoD) violations, moving from periodic audits to real-time risk control.
Phase 1 establishes the core detection engine, integrating directly with SAP S/4HANA or Oracle Fusion ERP systems via secure APIs to ingest user-role assignments and permission objects. A graph-based agent analyzes this data against a configurable SoD rule matrix, flagging conflicts like a user holding both 'create vendor' and 'post payment' permissions. This initial build delivers immediate value by identifying latent risks in the existing role structure, providing a clear inventory of violations for manual cleanup and setting the baseline for automated remediation.
Phase 2 introduces automated remediation by connecting the detection agent to ServiceNow or Jira for ticketing and integrating with the organization's Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) platform, such as SailPoint or Saviynt. Upon violation detection, a workflow agent automatically creates a ticket, routes it to the appropriate role owner for approval, and—upon authorization—executes the permission revocation via IAM APIs. This phase requires robust exception handling and approval gate design to prevent business disruption. Phase 3 expands to continuous control, linking the workflow to HR events for proactive prevention and generating automated evidence packs for SOX and internal audit, closing the loop on compliance.
Comparison of operational and financial metrics for traditional, periodic Segregation of Duties (SoD) audits versus a custom AI-driven continuous monitoring workflow.
| Metric | Current State (Manual Audit) | Custom AI Workflow |
|---|---|---|
Detection Cycle Time | Quarterly (90+ days) | Real-time (< 5 minutes) |
False Positive Rate Requiring Human Review | 40-60% of flagged conflicts | < 10% of flagged conflicts |
Mean Time to Remediate (MTTR) a Violation | 14-21 days | < 48 hours |
Annual Audit Preparation Effort (FTE-days) | 120-180 FTE-days | 20-30 FTE-days |
Coverage of Entitlement Changes | Sample-based (high-risk only) | 100% of changes in SAP/Oracle |
Audit Trail Completeness & Automation | Manual log compilation; spreadsheets | Automated, immutable logs with causal chain |
Risk of Undetected Material Conflict | High (gaps between audits) | Low (continuous graph analysis) |
Compliance Reporting Generation Time | 2-3 weeks per audit cycle | On-demand, automated reports |
Buyers evaluating a custom AI workflow for real-time Segregation of Duties (SoD) monitoring have practical questions about controls, integration, and risk. These answers address the core implementation concerns for technical and compliance leaders.
The workflow architecture assumes data quality is a runtime constraint, not a prerequisite. We deploy initial cleansing agents that normalize role names, reconcile user-to-account mappings, and flag ambiguous entitlements for human review before they enter the detection graph. A confidence score is attached to every permission record, and low-confidence data triggers automated data-quality tickets in ServiceNow or Jira for the system owner. This creates a feedback loop where the automation both detects SoD conflicts and systematically improves the underlying master data over time.
This page details a custom automation workflow that continuously monitors user entitlements across ERP systems to detect and flag potential SoD conflicts in real-time, preventing fraud and operational errors while simplifying SOX compliance.
This workflow automates the continuous detection of high-risk permission combinations across ERP systems like SAP S/4HANA and Oracle Fusion, moving beyond periodic audit cycles. It directly targets the operational bottleneck of manual entitlement reviews, which are slow, error-prone, and create windows for fraud or control failures. The savings come from preventing costly financial errors, reducing audit preparation labor by over 70%, and shrinking the risk exposure window from months to minutes. Implementation requires integrating with IAM and ERP APIs to ingest role assignments and transaction data.
The solution architecture centers on an orchestrator (e.g., LangGraph) that triggers graph analysis and rule-based agents against live entitlement data. Implementation involves building a real-time data pipeline from ERP systems, developing agents for conflict detection using predefined SoD matrices and anomaly detection, and integrating with ticketing systems like ServiceNow for automated remediation. Critical controls include configurable risk thresholds, mandatory human review gates for high-severity violations, and a full audit trail logging all agent decisions and actions for regulatory defensibility. A phased rollout would start with a single ERP module, validate detection accuracy, and then expand across the application landscape.
A production-grade SoD workflow requires precise coordination between business, security, and technical teams to translate compliance policy into automated, auditable enforcement.
Defines the critical SoD rule sets and risk thresholds based on SOX, internal controls, and business process knowledge. They validate the agent's logic, approve remediation playbooks, and own the audit-ready reporting outputs. This role ensures the workflow reduces manual audit sampling from quarterly to continuous.
Provides the technical blueprint for extracting user-role assignments and permission data from SAP S/4HANA, Oracle EBS, or similar ERP cores. They design the secure data pipeline to the orchestration layer and define the integration points for automated remediation tickets in ServiceNow or Jira.
Builds the core orchestration logic using frameworks like LangGraph or CrewAI to coordinate the detection agents. Implements the graph analysis for conflict detection, the rule-based alerting engine, and the APIs that trigger remediation workflows. This role focuses on exception handling, logging, and observability.
Operates the workflow post-deployment. They monitor the alert dashboard, triage high-severity violations flagged for human review, and oversee the execution of automated remediation actions. This role ensures the system reduces mean time to remediate (MTTR) SoD violations from weeks to hours.
Articulates the business case: preventing operational errors and fraud, reducing audit preparation costs, and de-risking the ERP environment. They secure budget, align stakeholders, and define success metrics tied to risk reduction and operational efficiency gains.
A successful rollout follows a controlled sequence: 1) Discovery & Rule Mapping (2 weeks), 2) Pilot on Non-Prod ERP (3 weeks), 3) Phased Go-Live by Business Unit with dry-run monitoring, 4) Handoff to SecOps with runbooks. Each phase includes change advisory board (CAB) approval for remediation actions.
Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy
We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.
This page details a custom automation workflow that continuously monitors user entitlements across ERP systems like SAP and Oracle to detect and flag potential SoD conflicts in real-time, preventing fraud and operational errors while simplifying SOX compliance.
This workflow automates the continuous detection of risky permission combinations that violate segregation of duties (SoD) policies, a critical internal control for preventing fraud and errors. Instead of relying on periodic manual audits, it uses graph analysis and rule-based agents to scan user-role assignments across SAP, Oracle, and other ERP systems in real-time. The operational upside comes from preventing costly financial misstatements and audit findings before they occur, while drastically reducing the manual labor of quarterly access reviews and control testing.
Implementation integrates with IAM platforms and ServiceNow for ticketing, using LangGraph or a custom orchestrator to manage the data flow and agentic logic. Key controls include configurable risk thresholds, mandatory human approval for critical role changes, and a full audit trail linking violations to remediation actions. The architecture must handle data quality issues from legacy ERP feeds and include exception routing for ambiguous cases, ensuring the system enhances—rather than disrupts—security and compliance operations.
About the author
CEO & MD, Inference Systems
Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.
His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.
How We Work
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
The first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
