Automation
Architecture review before implementation
Implementation scope and rollout planning
Clear next-step recommendation
A custom workflow architecture that integrates network automation with ServiceNow or similar ITSM platforms, enabling agents to read change requests, plan technical implementation, execute within approved windows, and update CMDB and ticket status—all within the ITSM workflow.
This workflow automates the high-latency, manual coordination between ITIL-driven service management and network DevOps teams. It eliminates the bottleneck of translating a ServiceNow change request (RFC) into specific CLI commands, scheduling, and post-change validation. The operational upside comes from slashing change lead times from days to minutes, reducing human error, and providing full auditability within the ITSM system of record, which is critical for regulated environments.
Implementation requires a central orchestrator, like LangGraph, to manage state and sequence specialized agents for parsing RFCs, planning network commands (via Jinja templates or intent translation), and integrating with network controllers (Cisco DNAC, Ansible) for execution. Critical controls include mandatory human approval gates for high-risk changes, pre/post-validation checks against a network digital twin, and immutable logging of all agent decisions and actions back to the ITSM ticket for compliance.
A custom workflow that integrates network automation with ServiceNow or similar ITSM platforms, bridging ITIL processes and network DevOps to improve auditability, coordination, and operational speed.
Manual handoffs between network engineers and ITSM operators create days of delay. This workflow automates the entire lifecycle: agents parse change requests, plan technical steps, execute within approved windows, and update CMDB/ticket status. Impact: Reduces standard network change cycle time from 3-5 business days to under 4 hours, freeing engineering capacity for strategic projects.
Ensuring every network change has a ticket, CAB approval, and updated CMDB is a manual, error-prone audit risk. The workflow embeds these controls: agents draft RFCs, route for approvals, execute only after ITSM gates are cleared, and generate immutable audit logs. Impact: Provides 100% traceability for compliance (SOX, ISO 27001) and eliminates findings related to unauthorized changes.
Copy-pasting ticket data into CLI templates and manually updating CMDB fields consumes hours and introduces risk. The workflow uses agents to generate configuration-as-code from ticket fields, validate syntax, push changes via API, and synchronize asset data back to the CMDB. Impact: Eliminates manual data entry errors and reduces pre/post-change manual work by over 90%.
Network teams work in silos from IT service management, leading to miscommunication during outages or major changes. This workflow creates a shared operating layer: agents post real-time execution status to the ITSM ticket and notify stakeholders via ServiceNow. Impact: Gives service desk and leadership live visibility into network change status, improving incident coordination and stakeholder communication.
When a network incident ticket is created, diagnosing the root cause requires manual logins across tools. The workflow triggers diagnostic agents that correlate alarms, analyze device configs, and post a probable root cause and remediation plan directly into the incident ticket. Impact: Slashes Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) by providing Level 1/2 with actionable data immediately, not after hours of investigation.
Managing a growing network estate typically requires proportional growth in network and IT operations staff. This workflow acts as a force multiplier: a single engineer can oversee a pipeline of dozens of automated, compliant changes per day managed through the familiar ITSM interface. Impact: Enables the network team to support 2-3x more devices and services without increasing operational headcount, directly improving OPEX margins.
A blueprint for a multi-agent system that automates the planning, approval, and execution of network changes within ServiceNow or similar ITSM platforms, bridging ITIL process gaps with network DevOps.
This workflow automates the high-latency, error-prone handoff between ITIL change management and network operations. It eliminates manual ticket parsing, reduces miscommunication, and ensures every technical action is traceable to an approved request. The operational upside comes from slashing change implementation time from days to minutes, improving auditability, and freeing network engineers from repetitive coordination tasks. Savings are realized through reduced mean-time-to-resolution (MTTR) for service requests and lower operational risk from manual errors.
Implementation integrates the orchestrator with the ITSM platform's REST API to ingest RFCs. Planning and validation agents use LangGraph for state management, querying network CMDBs and digital twins to generate a safe implementation plan. The execution agent interfaces with network controllers (Cisco DNA Center, Arista CloudVision) via Python or Ansible, with all actions logged back to the ITSM ticket for a complete audit trail. Critical controls include mandatory human approval for high-risk changes, automated pre/post-validation checks, and config rollback capabilities.
A custom AI agentic workflow for orchestrating network changes with ITSM tools bridges ITIL process compliance with network DevOps. This blueprint details the specialized agents, their roles, and the integration architecture required to automate change execution within a governed ITSM framework.
This agent acts as the workflow's entry point, integrating directly with ServiceNow or a similar ITSM platform via REST APIs. It monitors for new RFCs (Request for Change) or approved tickets, extracts technical requirements and constraints (e.g., maintenance window, impacted CIs), and initiates the technical workflow. It also handles the bidirectional sync, updating the ticket with execution status, results, and closing it post-validation. This bridges the ITIL process layer with the autonomous execution layer, ensuring full auditability.
This agent receives the business intent from the ITSM agent and translates it into a safe, executable technical plan. It queries the Network CMDB and digital twin to understand current topology and dependencies. Using rule-based logic and simulation, it generates the specific CLI commands or API calls (e.g., for Cisco IOS-XE, Juniper Junos, Arista EOS) required, sequences them, and identifies potential risks and rollback procedures. The plan is submitted back to the ITSM system as a draft implementation record for any required final human approval before execution.
The core execution agent operates within the approved maintenance window. It connects to network devices via SSH/Netconf or vendor APIs (Cisco DNA Center, Arista CloudVision) to push the validated configuration changes. It executes commands in the correct order, monitors for real-time success/failure codes, and triggers pre-defined rollback procedures instantly if a failure threshold is met. All actions are logged with exact timestamps and command output, creating a granular audit trail for compliance (e.g., SOX, PCI-DSS).
Immediately after execution, this agent performs automated validation to ensure the change achieved its intended state. It runs a series of verification commands (e.g., show commands, ping tests, BGP session checks) and compares results against expected baselines. It then updates the Configuration Management Database (CMDB) in the ITSM platform with the new, accurate configuration state of the changed devices. This closes the loop, ensuring network inventory is always current—a critical requirement for future changes and incident management.
This agent provides continuous oversight throughout the workflow lifecycle. It ingests telemetry from monitoring tools (Dynatrace, SolarWinds, streaming telemetry) to detect any anomalous performance degradation or errors triggered by the change. If an issue is detected outside the rollback scope, it classifies the exception and routes a high-priority alert with context to the appropriate NOC/SRE team via PagerDuty or Slack. It ensures automation does not operate in a black box and that human experts are engaged for unforeseen problems.
The workflow is built on an orchestration backbone like LangGraph or Temporal, which manages the stateful coordination between these agents. Agents are containerized (Docker) for scalability. Key integrations include: ServiceNow REST API (ITSM), Ansible or Nornir (execution abstraction), Redis (state caching), and Splunk or Datadog (observability and logs). The entire system is deployed as a resilient, Kubernetes-managed service with strict identity and access management (IAM) for all network and ITSM system credentials.
A phased implementation strategy for deploying an AI agentic workflow that automates network change orchestration within enterprise ITSM frameworks like ServiceNow, ensuring governance and scalability.
Phase 1 establishes the core orchestration engine, integrating with the ITSM CMDB and change management APIs. This initial layer focuses on ingesting approved RFCs, parsing technical requirements, and generating low-level implementation plans. The primary business value is eliminating manual translation errors between ITIL tickets and network device commands, reducing planning cycles from days to hours. Implementation uses LangGraph for agent coordination, with strict validation against network topology data before any action is queued.
Phase 2 introduces autonomous execution within pre-defined maintenance windows and risk bands. The orchestration layer sequences tasks across SDN controllers (Cisco ACI, VMware), traditional CLI-based devices via Ansible, and validates each step. Savings come from zero-touch execution, eliminating overnight operator shifts for routine changes. The final phase adds continuous learning, where agents analyze change success rates to refine planning logic. Critical controls include mandatory peer review for high-risk changes, comprehensive audit trails, and integration with existing network monitoring for real-time rollback triggers.
Comparison of manual network change management versus a custom AI agentic workflow integrated with ServiceNow or similar ITSM platforms.
| Metric | Current State (Manual) | Custom Agentic Workflow |
|---|---|---|
End-to-end change cycle time | 3-5 business days | 45-90 minutes |
Human review rate for standard changes | 100% | 15% (exception-based) |
Mean time to implement (MTTI) | 8 hours | 12 minutes |
Change-related incident rate | 8% | < 1% |
CMDB update accuracy post-change | 70% (manual entry) | 100% (automated sync) |
Audit trail coverage for compliance | Partial, spreadsheet-based | Complete, immutable log |
NOC/NetOps FTEs per 1000 changes/month | 5 | 1.5 |
Average cost per standard change | $450 | $85 |
This blueprint details a production-grade AI agentic workflow that automates network change execution within the governance of ServiceNow or similar ITSM platforms, bridging ITIL process and network DevOps.
This workflow automates the high-latency, error-prone process of manually executing network changes from ITSM tickets. It ingests approved change requests, plans the technical implementation (e.g., ACL updates, BGP tweaks), executes within the approved maintenance window via network APIs, and updates the CMDB and ticket status. The operational upside comes from eliminating coordination delays, reducing misconfiguration risk, and providing full auditability from business request to CLI command, directly improving change success rates and freeing network engineers for higher-value work.
Implementation requires deep integration with the ITSM platform's APIs for ticket lifecycle management and the CMDB. The orchestrator agent, built with frameworks like LangGraph, must embed business logic for risk assessment, routing complex changes for CAB approval. Execution layers interface with network controllers (Cisco DNA Center, Arista CloudVision) or direct device APIs. Critical controls include pre/post-change validation, automated rollback triggers, and immutable logging of all agent decisions and actions to the ITSM ticket for compliance.
Deploying an AI agentic workflow to orchestrate network changes within an ITSM framework involves specific technical and operational considerations. Below are answers to common questions about controls, risk, and integration.
The workflow begins with a data validation agent that ingests telemetry from SNMP, NetFlow, syslog, and device APIs. It performs schema checks, identifies stale or missing data, and flags anomalies before any decision logic runs. For critical changes, the system cross-references multiple data sources (e.g., comparing interface counters from the device and a network probe). Poor-quality data triggers an alert to the NOC and halts the automated workflow, routing the ticket for manual investigation. This gate prevents garbage-in, garbage-out scenarios that could lead to misconfigurations.
A custom workflow that deeply integrates network automation with ServiceNow or similar ITSM platforms. Agents read change requests, plan the technical implementation, execute it within the approved window, and update the CMDB and ticket status—all within the ITSM workflow.
The workflow uses ServiceNow, Jira Service Management, or BMC Helix as the central orchestration engine. All change requests, approvals, and audit trails are managed here. AI agents are invoked as virtual technicians within the ITSM workflow, pulling required data from the CMDB and pushing execution status back to the ticket. This ensures ITIL compliance and a single pane of glass for operations, bridging the gap between network DevOps and formal process governance.
Execution agents interface with network controllers (Cisco DNA Center, Arista CloudVision), SD-WAN orchestrators (VMware, Fortinet), or direct device APIs via platforms like Ansible, Nornir, or custom Python. These systems receive validated change plans from the ITSM-integrated agent, apply configurations in the approved maintenance window, and return pass/fail results. Integration here is critical for safe, idempotent execution and rollback capability.
Pre- and post-validation depends on real-time data from monitoring tools like Dynatrace, SolarWinds, or Kentik, and streaming telemetry from devices. Agents query this stack to establish a baseline, confirm change windows are safe, and verify the intended outcome (e.g., latency reduced, new route active). This closed-loop validation turns manual checklists into automated assurance, preventing silent failures.
Specialized AI agents use retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over network runbooks, topology maps from the CMDB, and historical change data to draft the technical implementation plan. In advanced builds, they interface with a network digital twin (e.g., Forward Networks, custom NetBox) to simulate the impact of the proposed change, identifying risks like routing loops or security policy violations before execution.
Post-execution, agents must update the Configuration Management Database (CMDB) and IP Address Management (IPAM) system (e.g., Infoblox) to reflect the new network state. This automated reconciliation ensures infrastructure records are always accurate, which is foundational for future automation, security compliance, and troubleshooting. The workflow treats the CMDB as a mutable source of truth updated by the agents' actions.
The workflow embeds mandatory approval gates in the ITSM ticket for high-risk changes (e.g., core router updates). It also routes exceptions and low-confidence agent decisions to human engineers via Slack, Teams, or the ITSM console. This control layer ensures safety and accountability, allowing automation to handle routine changes while experts focus on complex edge cases and oversight.
Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy
We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.
This page details a custom AI workflow that automates the planning, execution, and audit of network changes by deeply integrating autonomous agents with ServiceNow or similar ITSM platforms, eliminating manual handoffs and coordination delays.
This workflow automates the high-labor, error-prone process of translating a ServiceNow change request into safe, executable network commands. It eliminates the manual coordination between change managers, network engineers, and CMDB administrators, which typically creates days of delay and audit risk. The operational upside comes from compressing change implementation cycles from days to hours, reducing misconfiguration-caused outages, and providing a fully auditable, policy-compliant execution trail that satisfies ITIL governance requirements.
Implementation integrates a LangGraph or CrewAI orchestrator with the ITSM platform's REST API. Agents ingest the RFC, retrieve relevant device data from the CMDB, and draft a CLI/Ansible playbook using network-aware LLMs. This plan is submitted back to ServiceNow for automated or human approval. Upon approval, the orchestrator executes the change via network controllers (Cisco DNA, Ansible), validates success via post-checks, and updates the CMDB and ticket status. Critical controls include pre/post snapshots, automated rollback triggers, and mandatory human review for high-risk changes.
About the author
CEO & MD, Inference Systems
Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.
His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.
How We Work
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
The first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
