Automation
Architecture review before implementation
Implementation scope and rollout planning
Clear next-step recommendation
Legacy batch processes create operational latency and risk. This blueprint details the custom workflow that translates scheduled jobs into responsive, cloud-native services.
Nightly batch windows are a critical bottleneck, delaying business insights, creating single points of failure, and locking data in silos. Modernization automation analyzes COBOL JCL, shell scripts, and scheduler dependencies to extract business logic and data flows. The goal is to replace monolithic schedules with discrete, event-triggered services that improve data freshness, system resilience, and developer velocity, directly impacting operational throughput and IT cost.
Implementation requires a multi-agent system: one parses legacy syntax, another maps to cloud-native patterns (e.g., AWS Step Functions for orchestration), and a third generates integration code for systems of record like SAP or mainframe databases. Critical controls include automated reconciliation between old and new outputs, canary traffic routing with health checks, and rollback orchestration. The result is a phased, low-risk decomposition of technical debt into scalable, event-driven assets.
Replacing legacy batch processes with event-driven services delivers measurable improvements in operational responsiveness, cost structure, and system resilience.
Nightly batch windows create operational rigidity, delaying business insights and consuming expensive mainframe MIPS. Modernization to event-driven services (e.g., AWS Lambda, Azure Functions) processes transactions as they occur, reducing compute costs by 30-50% and freeing infrastructure for other workloads.
Batch delays of 12-24 hours slow order-to-cash, financial closing, and inventory reconciliation. Event-driven services trigger immediate downstream actions, reducing key process cycle times by 40-70%. This improves cash flow, decision velocity, and customer experience.
Manual analysis and rewriting of COBOL JCL or shell scripts is slow and error-prone. Automated translation workflows parse dependencies, map logic, and generate cloud-native orchestration code (e.g., AWS Step Functions, Kubernetes Jobs), cutting migration planning and development time by 60% while preserving business rules.
Monolithic batch jobs are black boxes with poor failure isolation. Modern, decomposed services built with frameworks like LangGraph enable granular monitoring, automatic retries, and dead-letter queues. This reduces mean time to recovery (MTTR) by 80% and provides clear audit trails for compliance.
Legacy batch files (FTP, EDI) create tight coupling with partners and internal systems. Modernization outputs real-time APIs and event streams (Kafka, EventBridge), enabling faster partner onboarding, microservices communication, and reducing integration development effort by 50% for new initiatives.
The automated workflow generates Infrastructure-as-Code (Terraform, CloudFormation), CI/CD pipelines, and comprehensive test suites alongside the new services. This creates a repeatable, scalable operating model that reduces ongoing maintenance costs by 40% and accelerates future enhancements.
This page details the custom AI workflow that analyzes legacy COBOL or shell script batch processes, maps their dependencies and schedules, and redesigns them as cloud-native, event-triggered services. It shows how this automation eliminates nightly batch windows, improves operational responsiveness, and generates the necessary orchestration code.
Legacy batch jobs create operational bottlenecks through rigid nightly windows, delayed data availability, and complex dependency management. Modernizing them to event-driven services eliminates these constraints, enabling real-time business responsiveness and reducing infrastructure costs tied to idle batch cycles. The automation workflow begins by parsing JCL, shell scripts, or COBOL programs to extract scheduling logic, data dependencies, and error-handling routines, mapping them into a service-oriented dependency graph for redesign.
Implementation leverages frameworks like LangGraph to orchestrate analysis agents, with outputs generating executable infrastructure-as-code for AWS Step Functions or Azure Durable Functions. Critical controls include automated validation of business logic equivalence, performance benchmarking against legacy SLAs, and integrated observability for the new event flows. This architecture supports phased cutover, allowing traffic to be routed from the old batch system to the new services based on real-time health checks, de-risking the migration.
This blueprint details the multi-agent system that decomposes legacy batch processes into cloud-native, event-driven services, eliminating nightly windows and improving operational responsiveness.
An agentic scanner parses mainframe JCL, shell scripts, and scheduler logs to catalog all batch jobs, their dependencies, data sources, and execution schedules. This creates a system-of-record for modernization planning, reducing months of manual inventory effort to weeks.
Specialized agents analyze COBOL, PL/I, or script code to extract core business rules, data transformation logic, and inter-job dependencies. This workflow outputs a directed graph of processes and data flows, which becomes the blueprint for service decomposition and ensures critical logic is not lost.
Using the dependency graph, an architect agent identifies bounded contexts and designs event-driven microservices. It then generates initial service stubs (e.g., in Java/Spring Boot or Python/FastAPI) with defined API contracts, message schemas (e.g., AsyncAPI), and integration points for cloud-native messaging (e.g., Kafka, EventBridge).
For complex, multi-step batch flows, the system automatically generates the corresponding orchestration code. This translates sequential or conditional job steps into state machine definitions for tools like AWS Step Functions, Azure Durable Functions, or Temporal workflows, complete with error handling and retry logic.
To validate behavioral equivalence, agents use the extracted logic and legacy test data to generate comprehensive unit and integration test suites. This includes mocking event sources and downstream services, providing immediate test coverage and a safety net for iterative refactoring within the CI/CD pipeline.
The final orchestration layer manages the gradual cutover. It automates canary deployments, dark launches of new event-driven services, and configures traffic routing (e.g., via service mesh) based on real-time health and performance metrics. This includes rollback procedures to de-risk the migration away from the legacy batch window.
A blueprint for de-risking the migration of legacy batch processes to cloud-native, event-driven architectures, focusing on phased delivery and operational control.
Legacy nightly batch jobs create operational bottlenecks, locking data and delaying business responsiveness. Modernizing these COBOL or shell scripts into event-driven services eliminates batch windows, improves data freshness, and reduces infrastructure costs. The automation workflow begins by analyzing job dependencies, schedules, and data flows to generate a target architecture of cloud-native functions and message queues, preserving critical business logic while enabling real-time processing.
Implementation follows a phased, strangler-fig pattern, deploying new services in parallel with the legacy batch. An orchestration layer (e.g., AWS Step Functions, Azure Durable Functions) manages the event flow, with automated canary releases and health checks governing traffic switching. This approach de-risks cutover, provides immediate rollback capability, and delivers incremental value—turning a monolithic, high-risk migration into a controlled, measurable operational upgrade.
Comparison of operating economics and control posture for legacy nightly batch processes versus modernized, event-driven services.
| Metric | Legacy Batch Process | Event-Driven Service Architecture |
|---|---|---|
End-to-End Cycle Time | 8-12 hour batch window | Near real-time (<5 min latency) |
Infrastructure Utilization | Peak-driven, 15% avg. CPU | Elastic, 60-70% avg. CPU |
Mean Time to Detect Failure | Next business day | < 5 minutes |
Operational Labor (FTE/year) | 2.5 (monitoring, restarts) | 0.5 (exception handling) |
Annual Infrastructure Cost | $240,000 (over-provisioned) | $85,000 (consumption-based) |
Audit Trail Completeness | Log files, manual correlation | Immutable, end-to-end trace |
Business Logic Change Lead Time | 6-8 weeks (code, test, schedule) | 2-3 days (service deploy) |
This blueprint details the governance and phased rollout architecture for safely transitioning legacy batch processes to event-driven services, ensuring operational continuity and risk mitigation.
The transition from scheduled batch jobs to event-driven services introduces significant operational risk if not governed. Our rollout architecture implements a dual-write pattern, where legacy and new systems run in parallel. Traffic is gradually shifted using feature flags and canary releases controlled by a central orchestrator. This allows for real-time performance comparison, immediate rollback on SLA breaches, and validation of business logic equivalence before full decommissioning, protecting revenue-critical operations.
Governance is enforced through automated reconciliation agents that compare output datasets and audit trails between systems, flagging discrepancies for human review. Approval gates are embedded in the orchestrator, requiring sign-off from platform engineering and business domain owners before advancing each rollout phase. This controlled, metrics-driven approach, integrated with existing ITSM tools like ServiceNow, transforms a high-risk migration into a predictable, auditable operational procedure with minimal business disruption.
Real-world concerns about controls, risk, and implementation for transforming legacy batch processes into event-driven services.
The workflow embeds validation agents that generate reconciliation test suites from the original batch logic. These agents run comparative executions between the legacy batch output and the new event-driven service output using synthetic and historical data. Discrepancies are flagged in an exception queue for human review. This automated, dual-write validation phase is critical for financial and operational systems where data integrity is non-negotiable, providing a defensible audit trail before any traffic is switched.
When modernizing legacy batch jobs to event-driven services, robust exception handling and observability are non-negotiable for operational integrity. This page details the custom workflow architecture that ensures failures are caught, diagnosed, and routed without manual intervention, protecting business continuity and providing audit trails for regulated environments.
The operational upside comes from eliminating the 'black box' of nightly batch windows. A custom orchestration layer, built with frameworks like LangGraph or Temporal, continuously monitors event flows. It automatically catches failures in data validation, API timeouts, or downstream system unavailability, applying predefined retry logic with exponential backoff. This prevents cascading failures and data corruption, directly reducing mean time to resolution (MTTR) and the operational risk inherent in cutover.
Implementation requires instrumenting every service with structured logging, distributed tracing, and metric emission to tools like Datadog or Splunk. The workflow must define clear exception categories—transient, business-rule, or systemic—and route them accordingly. Human-in-the-loop review gates are configured for non-retryable failures, escalating tickets to ServiceNow with full context. This architecture provides the observability needed to validate modernization success, prove regulatory compliance, and support continuous optimization of the new event-driven landscape.
Enabling Efficiency, Speed & Accuracy
We build AI systems for teams that need search across company data, workflow automation across tools, or AI features inside products and internal software.
Successfully migrating from nightly batch windows to event-driven services requires clear ownership across technical and business teams. This map outlines the key roles and their responsibilities in a custom automation build.
Owns the target cloud-native architecture (e.g., AWS EventBridge, Azure Durable Functions) and defines the standards for event schemas, service contracts, and observability. This team provides the foundational platform (IaC, CI/CD pipelines) and governance guardrails for the newly generated services, ensuring they meet non-functional requirements for scalability and resilience.
Provides deep domain knowledge of the COBOL, JCL, or shell script batch processes. Their role is to validate the business logic extracted by AI agents, clarify ambiguous dependencies, and sign off on the functional equivalence of the new event-driven workflows. They are critical for de-risking the translation of complex financial, regulatory, or operational logic.
Responsible for modernizing the data flows. This team designs the replacement for batch file drops (FTP, SFTP) with streaming pipelines (Kafka, Kinesis) or real-time APIs. They ensure data quality, lineage, and reconciliation checks are built into the new architecture, preventing data loss or corruption during the cutover from legacy ETL to event-driven ingestion.
Implements the deployment orchestration, monitoring, and operational runbooks for the modernized services. This team automates canary releases, configures alerting based on business events (not just server health), and establishes SLOs/SLIs for the new asynchronous system. They own the rollback procedures and ensure the system's operational integrity post-migration.
Defines the operational and commercial success criteria. This stakeholder group prioritizes which batch processes to modernize first based on business impact (e.g., reducing order-to-cash cycle time). They approve the new, real-time operating model, fund the initiative, and champion the change management required to move teams away from "waiting for the nightly run."
Builds the automated validation harness. This team works with the AI-generated unit tests and creates integration tests that simulate real-world event storms and failure scenarios. They are responsible for the performance benchmarking that proves the new event-driven system meets or exceeds the throughput and reliability of the legacy batch windows.
About the author
CEO & MD, Inference Systems
Prasad Kumkar is the CEO & MD of Inference Systems and writes about AI systems architecture, LLM infrastructure, model serving, evaluation, and production deployment. Over 5+ years, he has worked across computer vision models, L5 autonomous vehicle systems, and LLM research, with a focus on taking complex AI ideas into real-world engineering systems.
His work and writing cover AI systems, large language models, AI agents, multimodal systems, autonomous systems, inference optimization, RAG, evaluation, and production AI engineering.
How We Work
One-fit-all AI don't work for modern businesses. At Inferensys, we aim to understand your business & custom requirements; which we use to define most efficient agentic workflows, the data, and the tools for your business.
The first call is a practical review of your use case and the right next step.
